A couple of landscapesModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Re: A couple of landscapes
I reckon they are very nice lovely puffy white clouds...I assume a polariser was used, they are both nicely composed imo. Both would make excellent desktop backgrounds! gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: A couple of landscapesI like both of these, #1 has great leading lines. #2 seems like you need another cloud top left, to balance the composition (just me). The texture in the field is really nice.
Re: A couple of landscapesThanks guys. Yep I used a polariser on both the shots to get that nice blue sky.
I see what you mean about that cloud, the big one above the tree would be better if it were more to the left of the frame to balance with the tree. Jack
Re: A couple of landscapesJack
That firsd image really troubles me. There is so much to like about the shot - the framing is spot on, you have fantastic leading lines, the cloud is perched wonderfully - all in all it's an image that should sing to me and yet it doesn't. I think that the treatment just doesn't work for me. The sky is so dark it gives an alien feel to the shot and I'd actually like a little warmer image as well I think - but that's just me Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Re: A couple of landscapesPeter, it's the altitude AND the effect of the polariser that causes the dark sky. It does look odd though. Perhaps its because the foreground is brighter, which is kind of upside-down to what we would normally expect.
Still, I like both images. Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
Re: A couple of landscapes Mabye try takeing the polarizer off if your aiming for a more natural look, tho i really like #1 and way that it makes the clouds stick out and highlights them.
Last edited by Ben.bb on Sat Jan 17, 2009 10:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
Canon Body's, Canon Glass, Lowepro Bags, Manfrotto & Gittos Poles = My Empty Bank Account
Re: A couple of landscapesI usually like the polariser for landscapes like this because the darker sky adds contrast and a bit of drama to the photo. Having said that, these are the first photos that I processed after getting my new monitor, and I was having trouble getting the colours on the first photo right. I think I might even need to go back to the RAW and adjust the WB.
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|