Couple of portraits

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Couple of portraits

Postby JED on Mon Jan 26, 2009 12:57 pm

The learning curve keeps climbing as I start playing with studio strobes that I've had stashed away for a while.

Here are a couple that I consider "useable".

Beauty :)
Image

Beast :shock: (self portrait)
Image

Comments apprciated as always.

Cheers, John
JED

Nikon D600, D7000, D90, 70-300 D, 50mm f1.8, 85mm f1.8, 105mm macro f2.8, 18-70 kit lens, 35mm f1.8 dx,
sigma 10-20 dx, SB600, SB80dx, Metz 45ct4, & other stuff.

Why are there no cheap hobbies?
User avatar
JED
Member
 
Posts: 253
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 9:36 am
Location: Wynnum - Brisbane - D90/D7000/D600

Re: Couple of portraits

Postby Glen on Wed Jan 28, 2009 10:35 am

Nice set of portraits :D
http://wolfeyes.com.au Tactical Torches - Tactical Flashlights Police torch rechargeable torch military torch police military HID surefire flashlight LED torch tactical torch rechargeable wolf eyes flashlight surefire torch wolf eyes tactical torchpolice torch
Thank You
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Re: Couple of portraits

Postby JED on Wed Jan 28, 2009 4:00 pm

Thanks Glen.
The strobes are a bit trickier to set up than I thought they would be. Definetly need to get a flash meter in the future as my first guesstimate for exposure and power levels resulted in a slightly overexposed 'whiteout'. lol

Cheers, John
JED

Nikon D600, D7000, D90, 70-300 D, 50mm f1.8, 85mm f1.8, 105mm macro f2.8, 18-70 kit lens, 35mm f1.8 dx,
sigma 10-20 dx, SB600, SB80dx, Metz 45ct4, & other stuff.

Why are there no cheap hobbies?
User avatar
JED
Member
 
Posts: 253
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 9:36 am
Location: Wynnum - Brisbane - D90/D7000/D600

Re: Couple of portraits

Postby gstark on Wed Jan 28, 2009 5:20 pm

JED wrote:Definetly need to get a flash meter in the future


John,

While I certainly would not discourage your acquisition of a light meter (with flashmeter capabilities), there is no real need for that these days. At the various workshops that I've run, we've been able to acquire correct exposure within three images of starting the session, merely by chimping the histogram.

How many lights were you using for these images?

In looking at the first, I would suggest bring the primary (and only?) light source closer/further to a more frontal aspect on your model. You have quite heavy shadows on camera-right which would be eased through such an adjustment of the lighting location. Alternatively, a second light, positioned camera right, and maybe set to about 75% power compared with what you were shooting with the primary source.

For the second image (could you do something about the model? :) ) I'd perhaps move him further from the background to remove the background shadow.

Or maybe behind the background. :mrgreen:
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Re: Couple of portraits

Postby JED on Wed Jan 28, 2009 9:50 pm

Thanks for the critique Gary.

Reading histograms is not my forte so I didnt think to look at them. Getting an understanding of them will be a lot cheaper than a light meter. :)

We were after a fairly dramatic look with the first image. Its very close to what was envisaged but I would have liked a little more light to show her left eye better. One light shooting into an umbrella was used. I can't remember exactly what power level was set but it was right down after blowing out the first couple.

Point taken re #2. :lol:

Cheers, John
JED

Nikon D600, D7000, D90, 70-300 D, 50mm f1.8, 85mm f1.8, 105mm macro f2.8, 18-70 kit lens, 35mm f1.8 dx,
sigma 10-20 dx, SB600, SB80dx, Metz 45ct4, & other stuff.

Why are there no cheap hobbies?
User avatar
JED
Member
 
Posts: 253
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 9:36 am
Location: Wynnum - Brisbane - D90/D7000/D600


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques