Short & sharp or long & smoky?Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Short & sharp or long & smoky?Here are a couple of shots from after the sunset last night.
The question I pose is what is peoples preference, the short exposure, capturing the short half second exposure with "sharp" detail, water ripples etc, or the longer exposure of say 30 seconds that gives the soft smoky water effect Also these are the jpegs from the camera, if i was to post process the raw(in CS3) what would you suggest I do? and yes I know I need to learn to hold the camera straight! larger http://www.flickr.com/photos/wazonthehi ... otostream/ larger http://www.flickr.com/photos/wazonthehi ... otostream/ larger http://www.flickr.com/photos/wazonthehi ... otostream/ larger http://www.flickr.com/photos/wazonthehi ... 8/sizes/l/ whizzzz, there goes life again.....
But now captured on a Canon 40D with bits http://www.flickr.com/photos/wazonthehill/
Re: Short & sharp or long & smoky?I am a long and smokey fan. Love longer exposure over water at sunrise/set
D80, 50mm F/1.8, 18-70mm DX, Sigma 10-20mm
Re: Short & sharp or long & smoky?i prefer 4 and 2
Shane
Life's too short to be sad ! http://bigred4x4.blogspot.com/2008/01/welcome.html http://bigred.redbubble.com
Re: Short & sharp or long & smoky?Short and sharp for me, has more feeling of water than just a mist of clouds.
Re: Short & sharp or long & smoky?Waz
I'm with Shane - images 2 and 4 The point here is there is no right approach. It's all about the image - one is a long exposure and one is short, but the results are stronger images because of the other elements in the shot - #2 because the floats are really well defined, but we still have a hint of ripple in the water, #4 because it makes better use of leading lines with the row of floats drawing the eye to the small jetty, but you've still got that silky water. As an aside - where did you take these? Is it Lion's Park at Belmont? Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Re: Short & sharp or long & smoky?Stubbsy
This is the wharf opposite the dunnies near the intersection of Maude and Brooks st (sort of behind Coles Belmont) look north and you see the 16 footers (lights on left below) look south and you see the yachet club. See if the google map works, location is pin 1. http://maps.google.com.au/maps/ms?clien ... 1eb73dd40c Great part of the world ain't it!! Waz whizzzz, there goes life again.....
But now captured on a Canon 40D with bits http://www.flickr.com/photos/wazonthehill/
Re: Short & sharp or long & smoky?Cool - thanks Waz. Thought that was the spot - I have taken sunset shots from there before but didn't recall a line of floats running from there out to the platform
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Re: Short & sharp or long & smoky?Hey Waz,
I dont really like 1 or 2. But for the question asked I prefer the water in 2 but not the movement in the boat. I do however really like 3 and 4. These are both great. I would encourage you to keep taking the long and the short. The rflections are better in 3 and the floats stand out well in 4. You also dont notice the boat in 4 as much. Regards Colin
Cameras, lenses and a lust for life
Re: Short & sharp or long & smoky?I like 3 & 4 because of the composition
1 shot out of focus is a mistake, 10 shots out of focus is an experiment,
100 shots out of focus is a style!, anonymous.
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|