Queens ParkModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Queens ParkThe 'Nerima Gardens' in Ipswich's Queens Park. I was there as a part of our 'new members lessons' for the Photographic Society. Comments?
Regards
John Nikon D7000,Sigma 10-20, Sigma 24-70 F2.8, Sigma 70-200 f2.8, Nikkor 50 F1.8, Nikkor 85 1.8. Benro A650, SB600.
Re: Queens ParkThanks for the comments, framing and composition were part of the lessons.
Regards
John Nikon D7000,Sigma 10-20, Sigma 24-70 F2.8, Sigma 70-200 f2.8, Nikkor 50 F1.8, Nikkor 85 1.8. Benro A650, SB600.
Re: Queens Park#1 Does nothing for me. I know the reasoning behind it, I have taken many location markers in my time. But it is not a photo I would post for critique. Also, these days I Geotag my photos instead. I carry an external-to-the-camera GPS, then match photos to track log using the time stamp. If you are after more detail, look in "Equipment reviews" on this site for more info.
#2also seems to be a nothing shot to me. It just doesn't hold my interest at all #3 is great. Perhaps move the focus up or down a little the get the waterfall further from centre. #4 just misses the mark for me. I would like the plant moved so it is at the junction of the slab perhaps. Just speak sternly to the gardeners OK Another possibility would be to step back a couple of paces and just get both corners of the slab the chair is on, then crop top and bottom to bring the vertical framing back to what you have here. The result will be a pano style shot with, I think, stronger visual impact as you will no longer have those diagonals leading out of the frame. Remember, you can always crop stuff out. It can be very difficult to put in something you have missed. Greg
It's easy to be good... when there is nothing else to do
Re: Queens Park Wot Greg said...
Which society is that?
Re: Queens ParkMr Darcy; I cant afford a gps system at the moment, but I like you comments on the pics and have noted their failings.
Dave; It is the Ipswich Photographic Society, part of the South East Queensland Camera Clubs. I will be going back to the gardens in the near future to recompose some shots and get a few more, when it cools down a bit (I actually found it quite interesting) . Regards
John Nikon D7000,Sigma 10-20, Sigma 24-70 F2.8, Sigma 70-200 f2.8, Nikkor 50 F1.8, Nikkor 85 1.8. Benro A650, SB600.
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|