Unless they get too big for themselves, this is where you can talk about the "other" brands of DSLR's: Konica Minolta / Sony, Pentax / Samsung, Olympus, Horseman, etc.
Moderator: Moderators
Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is. Please also check the portal page for more information on this.
by andy on Thu May 14, 2009 10:13 am
Okay it's not really a game, but I'm wondering if anyone can help me ID what mount this is; I've googled and googled but can't quite make a match. I've only ever used Nikon so I don't have any experience with other mounts.  The lens itself was given to me as a freeby - no idea how old it is. It's marked as a Cimko, MC, MT Series, f4.5, 80-200. It's a pretty cool old thing and I've love to get a converter to use it manual on my Nikon - but don't know if this will be possible.
D90, 50 mm 1.8, 18-70 mm, Sigma 10-20 mm, SB600
-

andy
- Member
-
- Posts: 129
- Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 12:41 pm
- Location: Dunlop, Canberra
by Alpha_7 on Thu May 14, 2009 10:31 am
Cool that it was a freebie, my guess and this is only a stab in the dark is that it could be pentax. But I don't know mounts very well either.
-

Alpha_7
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7259
- Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
- Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9
-
by aim54x on Thu May 14, 2009 11:04 am
Older pentax is my gut feeling as well, although I have no real basis for that guess, can you provide a profile and 1/4 view shot as well? EDIT: I spent a few minutes looking online and have found this site but nothing there matches. I would not cross off the Konica-Minolta mount though
Last edited by aim54x on Thu May 14, 2009 12:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Cameron Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura BlackScout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
-

aim54x
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7305
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
- Location: Penshurst, Sydney
-
by sirhc55 on Thu May 14, 2009 11:22 am
I agree, it looks very much like a Pentax K mount.
Chris -------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
-

sirhc55
- Key Member
-
- Posts: 12930
- Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
- Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10
by andy on Thu May 14, 2009 11:24 am
I do think Cimko had a lot of pentax lenses. And it looks similar - but the static aperture lever looks like it's in a different spot to most Pentax K mounts I've seen on the net, and the dynamic aperture lever looks to short.
I'll get a profile shot tonight.
Sorry, what's a 1/4 shot? Just a closer shot of the bayonet in this case?
D90, 50 mm 1.8, 18-70 mm, Sigma 10-20 mm, SB600
-

andy
- Member
-
- Posts: 129
- Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 12:41 pm
- Location: Dunlop, Canberra
by Mr Darcy on Thu May 14, 2009 11:49 am
Sorry, what's a 1/4 shot? Just a closer shot of the bayonet in this case
I think what Cameron means is an angled shot so the 3D relationship of the elements is clearer. FWIW I also think Pentax K, though I don't agree with those that call this an "old" mount. I stopped buying Pentax when they dropped the screw mount. I looked at the new bayonet system & thought "Nahh - it'll never take off" Besides the early Pentax K cameras looked and felt like S**t. Maybe a PM to Big Red will confirm or deny. He seems to have a fairly major Pentax collection.
Greg It's easy to be good... when there is nothing else to do
-

Mr Darcy
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3414
- Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 11:35 pm
- Location: The somewhat singed and blackened Blue Mountains
by gstark on Thu May 14, 2009 11:56 am
I'm thinking it's a Canon FD Mount.
g. Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
-

gstark
- Site Admin
-
- Posts: 22924
- Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
- Location: Bondi, NSW
by photohiker on Thu May 14, 2009 12:03 pm
Could also be an OM mount.
What are the measurements of the bayonet tags. The Oly ones are each different, I make a local one 16mm 18mm and 22mm (roughly with ruler). The placement looks similar to your photo.
Michael
-
photohiker
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 687
- Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2008 11:56 am
- Location: Burnside, South Australia.
by andy on Thu May 14, 2009 12:14 pm
This is what I was going through last night!! Pentax, Canon, Olympus were all contenders.
But the more I look around now I think you are on to something with the Olympus call. The tags (which I'll measure tonight) look like they are in the correct location relative to the aperture levers, as well as the lens release button (to the right).
D90, 50 mm 1.8, 18-70 mm, Sigma 10-20 mm, SB600
-

andy
- Member
-
- Posts: 129
- Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 12:41 pm
- Location: Dunlop, Canberra
by aim54x on Thu May 14, 2009 12:32 pm
Cameron Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura BlackScout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
-

aim54x
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7305
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
- Location: Penshurst, Sydney
-
by photohiker on Thu May 14, 2009 1:10 pm
Sorry to be the bearer of bad news... It almost doesn't matter what mount that lens is - because of the relatively large flange-to-film distance on Nikon, the options for lens adaption are very limited. If it's an OM Mount, it's based on 46mm FtF and the Nikon body is 46.5mm. Infinity focus would not be possible. Both Canon FD and Pentax are similarly shorter than Nikon. Link to many lens mount specs and info at Markerink.org also Wikipedia List of Lens Mounts Michael
-
photohiker
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 687
- Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2008 11:56 am
- Location: Burnside, South Australia.
by andy on Thu May 14, 2009 2:28 pm
Well lets flag this one as solved then! I did measure the tags - 16,18 and 22 as Mike said. I don't mind if I can't focus at infinity, just a few km should do I did take a couple of shots (holding the lens in front of the camera) and it produced nicer images than a tamron 70-300 i used a few months back. But if there's no quick n easy fix for using it and won't focus correctly then I'd say it's time to give up. Thanks for the help! Hopefully I gave the '2 for 1' offer a bit of a help along...
D90, 50 mm 1.8, 18-70 mm, Sigma 10-20 mm, SB600
-

andy
- Member
-
- Posts: 129
- Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 12:41 pm
- Location: Dunlop, Canberra
Return to Other
|