Some B&W for which C&C is requestedModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
13 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Some B&W for which C&C is requestedI have captured some wonderful moments with Thomas and converted them to B&W and added a vignette. I would appreciate some C&C on the conversion, processing, vignette and contrast - too much, just right?
I have printed them all on Ilford Gallerie Gloss (only 4x6) from a calibrated monitor and they are less contrasty than they appear on my laptop - hopefully they don't appear too contrasty. thanks. Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Re: Some B&W for which C&C is requested
Feet, I trust? For the second one, in particular. I think that you've overdone the vignetting on the first one; for me it seems to intrude, especially towards the botom of this image. I would also like to see the contrast bumped a little, but then again I like rich, contrasty images. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Re: Some B&W for which C&C is requestedPatrick!
EXCELLENT images IMHO,but if u want some criticism, here goes. 1. I agree with Gary, slightly too much vignette, but only just! A little less light on Thomas' face would improve this shot. 2. Two words, perfect and priceless. 3. As per comment directly above Keep em coming mate! Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
Re: Some B&W for which C&C is requestedI actually prefer the first one and I don't mind the vignette, though maybe just a touch back from the arm.
Regards, Murray
Re: Some B&W for which C&C is requestedThanks guys - I agree with the comments on the vignetting.
Regarding the second shot, it is interesting to note that this is a crop of a larger image. In the original, Alicia is to the left of the image, reaching forward to make sure that Alex's hug is not to, um, enthusiastic. It gives the image a much more dynamic and different feel. Goes to show that the camera records an interpretation of reality. What would Energypolice say? Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Re: Some B&W for which C&C is requestedPatrick,
Would you care to post the uncropped version of #2? I'm always curious to see the original in cases like this, as well as to learn if the cropped image was your original intent, or if that, having seen what you had captured, you realised the level of intimacy that you captured and which makes this image what it is. In looking at this image again, I note that I can see Alicia's hand towards the bottom, and that is making me wonder about another crop of this image, perhaps square, to remove that element as well? g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Re: Some B&W for which C&C is requestedGary, as requested. No processing apart from adjustments in ACR.
Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Re: Some B&W for which C&C is requestedIncredible how the story told by a picture can be changed with a simple crop!
I'm with the other comments Patrick - and would like more contrast in the B&W's. Some wonderful moments captured for you all to savour over the coming years *** When getting there is half the fun! ***
Re: Some B&W for which C&C is requested
Thank you. Two entirely different images here. And I think that there's a lesson for all of us in what you've presented, Patrick. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Re: Some B&W for which C&C is requested
Yep, don't piss off your mother or hurt your brother Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
Re: Some B&W for which C&C is requested
No, that giraffes are all-seeing. Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Re: Some B&W for which C&C is requestedI am with Geoff. But then we are seeing the electronic version; the prints may improve them somewhat - or may not. I suggest to play with them till you are satisfied.
Re: Some B&W for which C&C is requestedHey Patrick,
I think something between #1 and #3 would be spot on. To me #1 looks a little ligt and #3 looks a tad dark. Bloody nice capture all the same. Regards Colin
Cameras, lenses and a lust for life
Previous topic • Next topic
13 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|