BW portrait

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

BW portrait

Postby darklightphotography on Sat May 16, 2009 4:02 pm

My model is Phillipe, a Belgian juggler. I wasn't sure about the disembodied head at first, but in BW I think it works well.

Critique/comments welcome.

Le Belge
Image




This is Phillipe at work, using mind control on the balls.

Image
Last edited by darklightphotography on Sun May 17, 2009 8:42 pm, edited 2 times in total.
darklightphotography
Member
 
Posts: 231
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2008 5:12 pm

Re: BW portrait

Postby Oneputt on Sat May 16, 2009 4:43 pm

Well disembodied head or not I love the first shot. It has that element of mystery about it. :D
"The good thing about meditation is that it makes doing nothing respectable"

D3 - http://www.oneputtphotographics.com
User avatar
Oneputt
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3174
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 3:58 pm
Location: Stuck in traffic Maroochydore.

Re: BW portrait

Postby zafra52 on Sun May 17, 2009 12:33 pm

It goes without saying which of the two photographs is the winner here. You used the lighting well to get such a dramatic image. Consider removing some distracting white objects on the left of the subject's face, make it all black. On the other hand, I am not sure if this image will be improved by cropping it square and getting rid of excesive black space so the face becomes even more prominent. It may or may not work. I am curious, what type of lighting did you use? Was it continuous, flash or strobe lighting?
User avatar
zafra52
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4827
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:22 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: BW portrait

Postby darklightphotography on Sun May 17, 2009 1:47 pm

zafra52 wrote:It goes without saying which of the two photographs is the winner here. You used the lighting well to get such a dramatic image. Consider removing some distracting white objects on the left of the subject's face, make it all black. On the other hand, I am not sure if this image will be improved by cropping it square and getting rid of excesive black space so the face becomes even more prominent. It may or may not work. I am curious, what type of lighting did you use? Was it continuous, flash or strobe lighting?


I tried out both suggestions, but I found the square crop was less appealing, probably because he is then looking at the edge of the frame, rather than into emptiness. It's a good suggestion though, I've found myself using a square crop more often recently.

Lighting was a single sb-600 camera right, about 2.4m off the ground. I had another strobe directly above the camera, but I think it was off for this shot. Exposure was 1/125s, f4 ISO800, D300 & 70-200 2.8 @ 170mm. It was so dark in the club (ISO3200 1/4s @ f2.8 ) that I struggled to focus most of the time. I think I need an SU-800 for focus assist.

Doing this shoot I did learn that the Nikon CLS using TTL is great for set-piece shots, but much less useful for stage shows. Part way through the show I changed both strobes to manual mode and found the lighting much more consistent.
darklightphotography
Member
 
Posts: 231
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2008 5:12 pm

Re: BW portrait

Postby zafra52 on Sun May 17, 2009 2:07 pm

Thank you for the info Kevin. I can understand your reasoning against the square crop, but consider removing those distracting bits on the left of the face because the viewer's eyes get drawn to them. Your technique reminds me of one of those Hollywood's glamour photographs of the 20's, and specially of of Charles Boyer.
User avatar
zafra52
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4827
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:22 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: BW portrait

Postby darklightphotography on Sun May 17, 2009 5:20 pm

zafra52 wrote:Thank you for the info Kevin. I can understand your reasoning against the square crop, but consider removing those distracting bits on the left of the face because the viewer's eyes get drawn to them. Your technique reminds me of one of those Hollywood's glamour photographs of the 20's, and specially of of Charles Boyer.


I think you've talked me into it. New version is in the original post. I left the bits in originally because I felt they framed his face and provided a sense of balance, but in the end I think it is a stronger image without them.
darklightphotography
Member
 
Posts: 231
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2008 5:12 pm

Re: BW portrait

Postby gstark on Sun May 17, 2009 6:16 pm

zafra52 wrote:Consider removing some distracting white objects on the left of the subject's face, make it all black.


I suspect that would be parts of the subject's hair. As such, I would be tempted to leave them as they are: they're a part of whom this person is.

I too have been thinking of a square crop, but not quite in the manner that is most obvious. This image clearly needs to have the space to camera left to work. To keep this, but also to crop square, you need to crop from the top rh side of this image as well, thus moving his face into the tr corner of the image.

Basically, use the space above the hat as your guide, and crop from the right to leave only a similar amount of space on that side. Now, with that space defined as your top and right edges of the image, you can crop square towards the bottom left.

As a different idea, I would like to see you bring just a very small part of his clothing and body into play: just a wisp, a hint of what he's wearing ... rather than total black. It should just be there - a very small amount of shadow detail.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Re: BW portrait

Postby SuperJT on Sun May 17, 2009 7:04 pm

The only part of the second shot that doesn't work is the red tie. If you got rid of that, he'd look like some sort of mage telling fortunes or casting a spell. Unfortunately it shows through the glass as well.
Canon 50D - EF-S 17-55 f2.8 IS - EF 100-400 L - EF 50 f1.8
SuperJT
Member
 
Posts: 53
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 9:57 am
Location: Ryde, NSW, Australia

Re: BW portrait

Postby darklightphotography on Sun May 17, 2009 8:40 pm

Originally I wanted some clothing detail, but thought there was none in the image. It turns out there was more than I thought, enough to give some hint of what he was wearing. I'm not sure yet if I like this better than my original version.

Image
darklightphotography
Member
 
Posts: 231
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2008 5:12 pm

Re: BW portrait

Postby gstark on Sun May 17, 2009 8:47 pm

Now you're talkin'! You've even managed to capture some separation between the subject and the background.


That is what b&W is all about.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Re: BW portrait

Postby zafra52 on Mon May 18, 2009 9:05 am

I suspect that would be parts of the subject's hair. As such, I would be tempted to leave them as they are: they're a part of whom this person is.
:?: :?:

I meant as you look at the person, which os course it is on his right. However, in the picture you can see it is some background reflection and that is what I wanted removed to have nothing but the head (with hair) and an abosolute black emptiness. :)
User avatar
zafra52
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4827
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:22 pm
Location: Brisbane


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques