Mt CookModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Re: Mt CookLooks like you had a nice day for it and nailed it during a break in the clouds! Can I suggest cropping from the bottom to remove some of that darker area and make it into a pano style? just a thought but its still a quinessential NZ shot.
gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: Mt CookGood ol NZ! It hasn't changed a bit
Nice capture and I would agree with Gerry's suggestion with cropping. If not, try to bring out a little detail in the dark if possible.
Re: Mt Cook
Yes it has. Mt Cook is smaller than it was the last time I saw it in the flesh Greg
It's easy to be good... when there is nothing else to do
Re: Mt CookAs suggested above:
Re: Mt CookA great improvement. Though now I would like to see more saturation in the sky as well. Bring out some of that cloud detail. Maybe a mask along the horizon line & just play with the sky. It needs to be subltle though. Too much and you will lose the sense of reality.
Greg
It's easy to be good... when there is nothing else to do
Re: Mt CookThe new one:
Re: Mt Cookgreat capture....... but where are the skiers
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer.... Removing objects that do not belong... happy for the comments, but .....Please DO NOT edit my image..... http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
Re: Mt CookThank you, but they were all away having a cup of coffee.
Re: Mt CookHi Zafra
Looking at the differences between the three images of the same photograph, it is amazing how much difference a little crop and a little sky saturation can make. You have turned a typical NZ photograph into a really good NZ photograph thanks to some learned advice from fellow members Well done to you and to them Cheers Graham
Re: Mt Cook
I reckon you could get away with some extreme editing NZ is unreal.
Re: Mt CookThank you all for your advice and input. Generally, I prefer to do as little editing as possible to keep the images as close as possible to the originals. This is mainly due to the fact that my knowledge and skills in post-processing are fairly limited.
Previous topic • Next topic
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|