Look up, look downModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Look up, look downWhat a difference your viewing angle makes. It's always a good idea to check a few different aspects. I know flowers are a cliche, but on the positive side, at least it's not cats or ducks.
Looking down: Looking up: TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic Nikon stuff!
Re: Look up, look downI like the second one just goes to show what a change angle will do.
Re: Look up, look downA good example of composition Trevor. The second is far superior because there is more separation between the flowers and the sky due to the lighter and less busy background.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Re: Look up, look downI like the first simply because the flowers are better defined and more in their own element
Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
Re: Look up, look downI think I also prefer the first one.
The second one seems a bit unreal. The cut flowers arranged against the sky like that almost say 'photoshop' and I start looking for the evidence even though I'm sure it's not and you took them against that background. If you really 'look up' you can get some interesting shots. I took a few in a Canola field last year, here is one looking up Michael
Re: Look up, look downYes, it's interesting, isn't it!
My wife thinks the second one looks artificial too, and she prefers to see more of the bloom as you see in #1. On the other hand, I prefer #2. I think it has a more open and brighter look to it. It sort of captures a spring feeling, even though it isn't spring. Both pix were taken in the same location, obviously shooting the same flowers, and the same dual flash lighting setup. The backgrounds are completely natural and untouched in PP. I've only done some sharpening and increased the clarity a tad in LR. Thanks for looking and your comments. TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic Nikon stuff!
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|