Vivid Sydney - HDR RevisitModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Vivid Sydney - HDR RevisitI finally had a chance to play with a HDR from the image in my earlier post.
I started off by saving -2, -1, 0, +1, +2 exposures of the image from the 14-bit RAW file and then loaded it all into Photomatix, then I ran it and tweaked the tone mapping a bit, before outputting into 16-bit TIFF and doing a bit of burn in on the centre using CS2. After this I hit it with Noise Ninja 2x before outputting to JPG. What do we all think?? Any tips? I am very new to this HDR business!! This is the original: Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Re: Vivid Sydney - HDR RevisitI wouldn't say it was a great subject to photograph, but your treatment highlights (pardon the pun) the fact that HDR can help overcome the dark/light areas in normal exposures. Keep 'em coming. HDR is fun, can be overdone but also can provide some amazing images.
Ozi. President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
Re: Vivid Sydney - HDR RevisitI think you've done very well. You've captured all the major details available from the various exposures. Given that a sensor picks up 3 stops of light and the the eye picks up around 11 stops of variation, my first question is always going to be "is that close to what I would see if I was standing there ?". I would definitely say yes.
Canon 50D - EF-S 17-55 f2.8 IS - EF 100-400 L - EF 50 f1.8
Re: Vivid Sydney - HDR RevisitThanks Val....I was trying to recreate my memory of the scene, still feeling my way around HDR though.
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Re: Vivid Sydney - HDR RevisitCameron, this is done in a subtle manner that appeals to me.
You would had some detail on the tunnel if you had bracketed. You can bracket 7 shots I assume.
Re: Vivid Sydney - HDR Revisit
Thanks! If I was to bracket on the night I can do a 9-frame bracket burst but would it be worth the trouble?? There is more detail in the tunnel but I cant get it to show without making the image as a whole look pretty horrible IMHO. Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Re: Vivid Sydney - HDR Revisit
Perhaps not for this image but it may be for other images that you were thinking HDR at the time of shooting. You should count your blessings; I only have 3 shot burst on my camera
Re: Vivid Sydney - HDR Revisit
I find that taking too many bracket burst frames just leads to more computing power needed to get the HDR. I have done some 9 frame bursts in the past and always ended up using 5 or so frames in CS2 to do the HDR. I may give 9 frame bursts another go, now that I am playing with Photomatix. Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|