D3 v D700

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

D3 v D700

Postby inmotion on Fri Jun 26, 2009 12:28 am

HI Does any one have first hand experience with the D3 v D700 comparison.
I Have A D300 and D700 I shoot outdooor sports with some indoor studio work.Other than frame rate what are the benefits of upgrading the D700 to a D3
Cheers inmotion :D :D
inmotion
Member
 
Posts: 402
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 11:53 pm
Location: Kangarilla-Adelaide Hills South Australia

Re: D3 v D700

Postby gstark on Fri Jun 26, 2009 1:22 am

Throw the MB-D10 loaded with AAs onto the D700, and the speed difference becomes insignifcant too.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Re: D3 v D700

Postby methd on Fri Jun 26, 2009 5:11 am

off the top of my head:

shutter life, viewfinder coverage, battery life, dual CF cards for backup, better weather sealing, better button arrangements (less use of menus), portrait grip integrated, CLS master on the D700

all pro features and not IQ features. If you shoot for a living... D3 is a must, but if you're shooting as a hobby or you don't shoot much, then a d700 is just as good.

I've got two D3 bodies, one D3x and one D700. I never use the D700 and it only ever sits as a third backup.
http://www.lumensphotography.com
Nikon gear. D3x, D3s, D3 ... and lots of lenses.
User avatar
methd
Member
 
Posts: 483
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 9:12 pm
Location: Melbourne, VIC.


Return to General Discussion