Answering nature's callModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Answering nature's callI am excited with my picture in this month issue of Australian Photography and the editor commenting that this picture "...has touches of a Jeffrey Smart painting!". Unfortunately, my picture is being attributed to another photographer and her work, which is possibly better, to me; but you be the judge.
Re: Answering nature's call
How did that happen?? Congrats though, I cant say that it is amazing IMHO but it is still nice. Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Re: Answering nature's callWell i must say, that title had me confused - i was expecting some dude taking a leak or something (is he taking a leak?)
I like the image, the concept of rolling hills and the fading light is something that works well here, however getting the guy completely in the light (waiting 1/2 min longer) and reducing the amount of shadows at the bottom may have helped more? Mainly to draw more attention to the guy rather than the bright field. More defined harvest lines in the field would have also helped to guide the viewing eye through the picture - so you will have to have words to that farmer about improving his fields for photography anyways, just my opinion and prolly talking crap as usual - but you did get me to google Jeffery Smart and I can see why the similarity was raised!
as long as your happy with that gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: Answering nature's callI like this picture. I do agree with Gerry's comments about drawing attention to the man. The uneven lighting does add to the picture though.
If he is, I can tell you that he is most likely right handed. He is also standing on one leg. Maybe that's how farmers do it?
Re: Answering nature's callThank you guys. First, it is the dog that just finished answering the call. The man, as far as I could tell, was not. Second, what happened is that my picture (above) has a lady's name next to it and her picture has my name. I guess it is a genuine mistake, but annoying none the less.
Re: Answering nature's callThis photo has an eternal timeless quality about it.
The fall of sunlight across the fields and across the dog walkers back and the rule of thirds just draws the eye into the photo so naturally. The sunlight light across the field is warm and the clouds are dark, cold and somewhat menacing. All in all, in my opinion, this is a lovely photo of contrasts, patterns, light and warmth and well deserving of praise indeed! Well done again Zafra Cheers Graham
Re: Answering nature's call
well how about that! I did not even notice there was a dog. *turns monitor brightness up* gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|