Mother and Daughter

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Mother and Daughter

Postby Alex on Sun Jul 05, 2009 11:58 pm

Something I shot this afternoon for fun.

Image

Thanks for looking

Alex
User avatar
Alex
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon

Re: Mother and Daughter

Postby surenj on Mon Jul 06, 2009 2:04 am

I like it. shows the connection between the two well. Light could be softer? What light did u use?
User avatar
surenj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7197
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Artarmon NSW

Re: Mother and Daughter

Postby Alex on Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:11 am

Thanks Surenj,

I deliberately used hard light sources to somewhat outline the difference in skin texture.

Cheers
Alex
User avatar
Alex
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon

Re: Mother and Daughter

Postby surenj on Mon Jul 06, 2009 12:16 pm

How were the lights positioned?
User avatar
surenj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7197
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Artarmon NSW

Re: Mother and Daughter

Postby Alex on Mon Jul 06, 2009 12:20 pm

Two lights:

- Almost on-axis main light with a snoot
- Separation (hair light) at 90 deg. to the main light from above.

Cheers
Alex
User avatar
Alex
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon

Re: Mother and Daughter

Postby surenj on Mon Jul 06, 2009 3:25 pm

Thanks Alex,
I never knew how to light this type of picture. I would like to hear others' opinions about the hard light used in these.
User avatar
surenj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7197
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Artarmon NSW

Re: Mother and Daughter

Postby Alex on Mon Jul 06, 2009 4:17 pm

surenj wrote:I never knew how to light this type of picture.


Neither do I - :biglaugh:
User avatar
Alex
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon

Re: Mother and Daughter

Postby Reschsmooth on Mon Jul 06, 2009 4:26 pm

It's a great image - the pose and eye contact is excellent.

For me, however, the hard lighting doesn't seem to complement the image, in particularly, the child's left hand, which is the brightest subject of the image.

I wonder if a larger, softer main light, off-camera axis may have worked better? I appreciate this may counter the look you were aiming for, in which case, you can ignore my comments. :D

The child and mother's faces are slightly off-centre to each other (the child appears slightly away from the camera, relative to her mother's face) - if you moved the child over towards the camera a little, and then placed a large light source (brollie/soft box) above the mother's left shoulder and towards the camera, pointing down at the child and mother's faces, you may get softer light. You can then position your hair/key-light as you wish.

Just a thought - I often struggle lighting a couple who are facing each other.
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Re: Mother and Daughter

Postby Alex on Mon Jul 06, 2009 5:07 pm

Thanks for the very useful comments, Patrick,

I agree with you about the hand - it is too bright.
One of the reasons why I used the hard light here was to see more of the skin texture and thus the difference between that of the mother and daughter.

The other reason was to avoid light spill which results from relatively large light sources such as softboxes or umbrellas. This can also be avoided by using a telephoto lens also - I might try it next time as I want to repeat this shoot.

I had a couple of more from this session, with the same lighting set up and might post them tonight.

Cheers

Alex
User avatar
Alex
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon

Re: Mother and Daughter

Postby Matt. K on Mon Jul 06, 2009 6:14 pm

This picture has some wonderful elements despite a few minor technical hitches. The image has a wonderful feeling of intimacy and I can feel the bond between the mother and child. I think picture content will always win over technical excellence and your image is an example of this. Nice work! PS...Try similar images using natural window light on 1 side and a white sheet of cardboard or foam as a reflector on the other side. This simple lighting will enhance images such as the above.
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Re: Mother and Daughter

Postby Alex on Mon Jul 06, 2009 7:40 pm

Thanks so much for the comments, Matt.
I will experiment more with the lighting set up shortly, using the same theme. For now I imbedded two more from this session, but I still prefer the first one.

Image
Image

Cheers

Alex
User avatar
Alex
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon

Re: Mother and Daughter

Postby surenj on Mon Jul 06, 2009 9:22 pm

Reschsmooth wrote:The child and mother's faces are slightly off-centre to each other (the child appears slightly away from the camera, relative to her mother's face) - if you moved the child over towards the camera a little, and then placed a large light source (brollie/soft box) above the mother's left shoulder and towards the camera, pointing down at the child and mother's faces, you may get softer light. You can then position your hair/key-light as you wish.


Hey Patrick,

I don't quite understand. Are you suggesting this?

Image
User avatar
surenj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7197
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Artarmon NSW

Re: Mother and Daughter

Postby zafra52 on Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:11 pm

I like the picture because you captured the beautiful relationship between mother and daughter. I don't lime as much the last one, sepia?
User avatar
zafra52
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4827
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:22 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: Mother and Daughter

Postby Reschsmooth on Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:30 pm

Surenj, something like that - however, the "fill" would be the main and the "key" would be a hairlight behind the subjects. I would also move the child closer to the camera, slightly.
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Re: Mother and Daughter

Postby Alex on Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:38 pm

zafra52 wrote:I like the picture because you captured the beautiful relationship between mother and daughter. I don't lime as much the last one, sepia?


Thanks Zafra,

The last one is not quite sepia but a result of layer bleding. I agree it does not really work here.
Cheers
Alex
User avatar
Alex
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon

Re: Mother and Daughter

Postby surenj on Tue Jul 07, 2009 2:26 am

Reschsmooth wrote:Surenj, something like that - however, the "fill" would be the main and the "key" would be a hairlight behind the subjects. I would also move the child closer to the camera, slightly.

Patrick I need a tutorial from you at the portrait workshop. [I am hoping for one in the near future]


Alex, like yourself, I still like the first one better. AS it's being said, the technical side goes out of the window with this sort of emotional portrait.
User avatar
surenj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7197
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Artarmon NSW

Re: Mother and Daughter

Postby Reschsmooth on Tue Jul 07, 2009 9:38 am

surenj wrote:Patrick I need a tutorial from you at the portrait workshop. [I am hoping for one in the near future]


I am not sure I am the person to run tutorials on lighting! :D
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques