IrisModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Re: IrisI have to admit that the colours are very nice...good work with there....BUT the Iris itself is a strange to look at, there is a lot of it out of focus (I do that all the time as well) and in this case these bits are often in front of the focal plane and obscuring the detail of the flower. These flowers a a pain to shoots but a bit more DOF and maybe a different angle will help.
Hope this Helps. Cameron Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Re: IrisI agree with Cameron on this shot, BUT. . . I think that as an abstract it works 100%
Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
Re: Iriscolours are great here and I actually like the use of the negative space on the RHS, but I think cam has nailed it...
gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: Irisi'll go the opposite. i love the fact that there is no sharp point in this shot. its got a very pastelly painted kind of look about it that imo looks fantastic. my only point would be that the browny leaves are somewhat distracting as they clash with the tone of the rest of the colours. great job zaf.
EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
Re: IrisThe original image...very seductive/sensual...magic blues. It works at every level for me and I would just love to see it as a very dark, very large print framed and hanging on a white gallery wall. Now I'm back for another look.
A master work. Regards
Matt. K
Re: IrisHi,
I agree with all of the above. This sort of shot maybe works better if you think of it more as an abstract than a 'flower' shot. A little more DOF, as already mentioned would help. I'd also be inclined to try to get the long bottom leaf more highlighted like the rest of the flower. This maybe would make it 'leap' off the page even more. I really like the background, its almost like it's a panning shot where you got motion blur. Oh, and when nobody's watching I would cut the brown leaf off and re-shoot, the blue-green of the shot works really well and I think the brown leaf detracts a little. The vibrancy of the blue and yellow work really well in the shot.
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|