Some portraits for critiqueModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Some portraits for critiqueRecently had a chance to photograph some willingly unwilling and unwillingly willing subjects. As usual I would love to hear your comments and critique. Thanks for looking.
Re: Some portraits for critiqueSurenj, beautiful lighting on 2 and 3
http://wolfeyes.com.au Tactical Torches - Tactical Flashlights Police torch rechargeable torch military torch police military HID surefire flashlight LED torch tactical torch rechargeable wolf eyes flashlight surefire torch wolf eyes tactical torchpolice torch
Thank You
Re: Some portraits for critiqueVery nice surenj, they are sooo sharp, like the lighting as well.
"Old school" (Olympus OM 1&2SP )
Re: Some portraits for critiqueI like that last one! Great idea with the coloured light behind the doors...The oval shaped glass pane in the last is just in teh wrong spot, I think the little tackers head should cover it up a bit - I can imagine saying this in hindsight is easy Also I reckon I think some eye contact may have helped too, however this is obviously dependent on what look you were going for!
no prizes for the unwilling one! Is that a plaster on her foot there or a big sock? As glen said, though, great lighting.... gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: Some portraits for critiqueNice work...almost everything I was thinking of has been mentioned...
On a more mundane note...I cant work out the reflection on your glasses...what did you use to light that first shot? Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Re: Some portraits for critiqueNumber two's a winner
Love the lighting, the angle of the background infers action, while the eye contact with the keys reflects wonderfully with the joy shown in the face. If anything, maybe a bit more of the keys could be in view, but I'm not certain - maybe the small amount shown adds in some way a little intrigue? In any case, it's a great shot. Number 3 is also good, but for me not as strong as the 2nd. *** When getting there is half the fun! ***
Re: Some portraits for critique
ceiling fan/light gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: Some portraits for critiqueI think the lighting in #3 is great, the second has a great expression on her face.
Regards Colin
Cameras, lenses and a lust for life
Re: Some portraits for critiqueI really love No.3! The lighting, compositon and background are all very well handled.
Alex
Re: Some portraits for critiqueThanks everyone for their comments.
Cameron, I just used a silver umbrella....
Gerry, That is a great idea to make a hard continuous light source into a soft source by using a slow shutter and attaching the light to a fan!
I think the sock is slipping off! I didn't notice that....
I see your point about the oval glass pane... I will sift through the rest of the images to see whether I had got one by mistake... eye contact was quite difficult as she only looked at her parents..... and smiled
I didn't use a coloured light! I wish I could have, but poon's triggers won't stand up to that much distance etc...This would be the all mighty sun streaming through. Just gelled the flash
I can see what you mean Leon.. when I look at the ones with the background straight, it would appear to be less dynamic. The crooked background was a mistake in my mind but I noticed halfway so half my photos are straight!
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|