Oarsome Wings :-)Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
13 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Oarsome Wings :-)Well they may be oars along this bridge, but I can't help but think of the fable of winged Icarus when I look at this image.
Hopefully my black and white treatment has done the image justice. Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Re: Oarsome Wings :-)Certainly, this is no oardinary image, Peter.
What's interesting is that while it may look as if it's not quite straight, it is. Perhaps the shadow of the gentleman walking across the bridge contributes to this impression, or perhaps it's because your PoV is not quite centred. Regardless, it looks good. I would like to see perhaps a tad more contrast in the conversion, and perhaps a little shaved off the top. Not quite short back and sides, though. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Re: Oarsome Wings :-)Peter, I like it. It's one of those pictures taken because you are there at the right time, at the right place and at the right time. Ok it's not quite perferct, but it is what it is. As such, it says so much more...
Re: Oarsome Wings :-)
Thanks Gary - how's this? Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Re: Oarsome Wings :-)the revised version rocks. love the pano style. i'd go even tighter actually, really ram that image down the viewers throat. excellent work.
EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
Re: Oarsome Wings :-)Peter,
Better ...
Same here. On the left, you have the horizontal roofline of a building. I think that's Smith St, and it would be a block of units. I would use that as my crop point, and remove everything above that point. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Re: Oarsome Wings :-)I agree with your title Peter.
I really like how the railings bulge out with the wings. Pano style does look a bit better. Regards Colin
Cameras, lenses and a lust for life
Re: Oarsome Wings :-)I like it, but I'm with Gary on the illusion of not being straight - I keep falling off to the right when I look at it
Congrats on 10,000 posts btw *** When getting there is half the fun! ***
Re: Oarsome Wings :-)You guys are a tough crowd Here is Gary's tighter crop, plus some photoshop trickery to make it look straight
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Re: Oarsome Wings :-)Very nice work there peter, each iteration has improved (great to see the suggestions being implemented) but the question now is....do you think there is an improvement?
It is a very interesting location and I think I will have to make a trip out to Parra to find it for myself. Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Re: Oarsome Wings :-)The reworked image feels 'better' but I did not have an issue with the straightness, however the pano style crop really tightens up the view and helps to isolate the main subject, the man...or the bridge..either or nice one!
gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: Oarsome Wings :-)Peter,
Now it's a lot better than just oar-right. But the real question remains: which version do you prefer? g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Re: Oarsome Wings :-)
I actually prefer the second last version (more sky cropped just above the central tree) but with soime "straightness" correction. The last one is too tight for my tastes and a little too dark. For me the bit of sky gives some balance. Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Previous topic • Next topic
13 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|