Portraits (NSFW)

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Portraits (NSFW)

Postby darklightphotography on Tue Aug 04, 2009 9:53 am

Some portraits from last weekend.

C&C welcome.

#1 - Miss Monnie
Image

#2
Image

#3
Image

#4 - not really a portrait
Image
darklightphotography
Member
 
Posts: 231
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2008 5:12 pm

Re: Portraits (NSFW)

Postby Mr Darcy on Tue Aug 04, 2009 11:15 am

I really like #4, and I disagree. It IS a portrait, and a very good one.
A head shot is simply the most common style of portrait.
A portrait is (within this context) a photograph that tells us about a person. This tells me a lot about your subject, possibly more than a head shot would have done. I will certainly recognise her if I see her walking down the street ahead of me :)
Greg
It's easy to be good... when there is nothing else to do
User avatar
Mr Darcy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3414
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 11:35 pm
Location: The somewhat singed and blackened Blue Mountains

Re: Portraits (NSFW)

Postby chrisk on Tue Aug 04, 2009 8:43 pm

agree, #4 is easily my favourite aswell. love the bubblegum-ish hi key you used there contrasting with the pumps and the tatts. great shot and well seen. i think you need to do some podiatry-photoshop on her heels though.
EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
User avatar
chrisk
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3317
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:50 pm
Location: Oyster Bay, Sydney

Re: Portraits (NSFW)

Postby aim54x on Tue Aug 04, 2009 9:46 pm

nice work as always, the last is a bit different but very attractive at the same time, it really is a portrait.
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42
Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black
Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
User avatar
aim54x
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7305
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
Location: Penshurst, Sydney

Re: Portraits (NSFW)

Postby gstark on Tue Aug 04, 2009 10:29 pm

I like the first two, but I feel that there's much more to be taken from what you've posted here, Kevin.

#1: how did you do the B&W conversion? It looks to me like a print from a fogged negative, and as such it, for me, severely lacks contrast. It looks muddy and has no punch.

Let's see if we can make this something special; I believe that it has the makings of that.

#2: I don't like the hues in this; the bubble gum pink looks (and is) unnatural. I don't think the issue is wb, but the whites of her eyes do have a pink tinge to them.

I do love the texture on her face however. I think you need to go back to basics, pull the colour to something better (if you agree with me, of course) but keep the texture.

And yes, the last one is a portrait too.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Re: Portraits (NSFW)

Postby sirhc55 on Tue Aug 04, 2009 10:39 pm

Sorry guys but I disagree: A portrait is a painting, photograph, sculpture, or other artistic representation of a person, in which the face and its expression is predominant.
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Re: Portraits (NSFW)

Postby surenj on Tue Aug 04, 2009 11:06 pm

The 2# may have benefitted from hard light as it's kinda dark and goth style low key image.... Agree with boosting the contrast in the first one.
User avatar
surenj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7197
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Artarmon NSW

Re: Portraits (NSFW)

Postby Big V on Tue Aug 04, 2009 11:46 pm

What a wonderful selection of interesting people
Canon
User avatar
Big V
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2301
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 1:37 am
Location: Adelaide

Re: Portraits (NSFW)

Postby muzz on Wed Aug 05, 2009 1:35 am

sirhc55 wrote:Sorry guys but I disagree: A portrait is a painting, photograph, sculpture, or other artistic representation of a person, in which the face and its expression is predominant.

Or alternatively, if you look at definitions other than Wikipedia:

portrait |ˈpôrtrət; -ˌtrāt|
noun
1 a painting, drawing, photograph, or engraving of a person, esp. one depicting only the face or head and shoulders.
• a representation or impression of someone or something in language or on film
Canon 7D | Canon 350D | G5 | S95 | 24-70mm f2.8L | 50mm f1.8 II | 70-200mm f2.8L USM | 430EX II | Strobist gear
User avatar
muzz
Member
 
Posts: 240
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 2:42 am
Location: Mandurah, WA

Re: Portraits (NSFW)

Postby darklightphotography on Wed Aug 05, 2009 8:42 am

gstark wrote:I like the first two, but I feel that there's much more to be taken from what you've posted here, Kevin.

#1: how did you do the B&W conversion? It looks to me like a print from a fogged negative, and as such it, for me, severely lacks contrast. It looks muddy and has no punch.

Let's see if we can make this something special; I believe that it has the makings of that.

#2: I don't like the hues in this; the bubble gum pink looks (and is) unnatural. I don't think the issue is wb, but the whites of her eyes do have a pink tinge to them.

I do love the texture on her face however. I think you need to go back to basics, pull the colour to something better (if you agree with me, of course) but keep the texture.

And yes, the last one is a portrait too.


For the first, I've switched from Bibble to Lightroom and I'm not yet happy with my BW settings. I've added some lightness to #1 and changed the colour mode on #2. Both a bit better now.

It's a big learning curve changing software, but Bibble is dead in the water now so I had to do it.

#1 with added contrast
Image

#2 depinked
Image


This pic of my studio might give you some idea of why I sometimes have colour issues. :?
Image
darklightphotography
Member
 
Posts: 231
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2008 5:12 pm


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques