Close, But No CigarModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
16 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Close, But No CigarI went shooting at the park today expecting the trees, grounds and the ducks. Well... no ducks. Instead several squirrels.
I almost got this little guy but had a little trouble with the focus. It's better on the body than the face. I'll have to read my manual some more and do more experimenting. 70-210mm at full tilt. f5.6, 1/500th handheld.
it's still a great shot... nice...
cheers http://www.markcrossphotography.com - A camera, glass, and some light.
Still a very nice shot Steve. We do not have squirrels in Australia but I do remember them with affection in the UK.
Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
Wonderful shot.
At any extreme of a zoom, you are going to get a loss in sharpness, and some light fall off at the edges, more so the cheaper the lense. The 70-210 is a great little lense, and i think the problem here if i may is the Aperature of F 5.6 a little to shallow a depth of field to get the whole subject sharp, perhaps 1/250th @ F8 or 1/125th @ F11 would have done the same exposure with more depth of field. Congrats though, very nice.
Ahhh... I actually miss squirrels.
They're cute little buggers. Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
Great shot. The contrast between the tree on the left and the soft area to the right really make it for me.. They're both soo warm and rich.
Don't beat yourself up over the focus. I usually get all the technical parts right (focus, exposure, etc.) and my shots still stink because I'm no good at the composure. The composure here is perfect. Way to go. You'll perfect the technical parts, but I'll likely never suddenly 'be' artistic -Rich
Steve
I think this is a great shot. Nice warm colours, good composition and the slight softness doesn't really distract. Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Fantastic photo!
*twitches nervously* My only take on squirrels was when i was in england for 2 years, they would jump out of the trees and literally attack unsuspecting victims walking underneath... I can see the winning photo now, birds-eye view of a squirrel freefalling, teeth bared towards an unsuspecting passer-by... ... thanks to 3 mins and MS paint. JD
Previous topic • Next topic
16 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|