3 Quicky B & WsModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
15 posts
• Page 1 of 1
3 Quicky B & WsI'm finally working my way through the Pyrmont/Anzac bridge shots from last weekend and these 3 seemed best as black and whites. Each is quite a different shot, so I'd be interested in your views in if they work as b & Ws. All were processed using Nik Silver Efex Pro.
Click an image to see it larger. Thanks for looking. Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Re: 3 Quicky B & WsI like number 3 (which must be with a fisheye).
There's an opportunity to add in someone walking out of a half- open doorway.... Regards, Murray
Re: 3 Quicky B & Ws3 good B&W images..... the 3rd image is just fantastic.....
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer.... Removing objects that do not belong... happy for the comments, but .....Please DO NOT edit my image..... http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
Re: 3 Quicky B & WsThey are 3 great images Peter! The last is exceptional, I spent so long trying get all that in 17mm, the use of the fisheye there was a perfect choice, that also has to be the closest to symmetry as your gonna get from that bridge position!
The more I look at #3 the more I like it, the composition of the image reminds me of a insect (bear with me here!) the plyons are the body and the cables the wings - that image would look awesome as a desktop background! Whilst the second image may look simple and plain enough, to look at that building and compose those lines is quite an achievement in my opinion, I just walked by that one was there any distortion correct on this one? In terms of BW conversions, I think they all work well, however I would be interested in seeing that third one as a colour version, in particular with a nice blue sky...?! gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: 3 Quicky B & WsVery nice work... I have to admit that #3 is absolutely stunning!
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Re: 3 Quicky B & WsLove #3 the perspectives are amazing, it took me a second to work them out!
Re: 3 Quicky B & WsGreat job - love #3 but would you be able the color shot so I can work out where/what it is
DebT DebT
"so many dreams - so little time "
Re: 3 Quicky B & WsGeez, I thought there were going to be three B&W (and hence artistic, not tawdry) shots of Stubbsy having a quicky
Instead, just more of his excellent photographs. All great Peter, #2 has a real sixties feel to it. Love them all. Greg - - - - D200 etc
Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see. - Arthur Schopenhauer
Re: 3 Quicky B & WsI think the first one might even work better in sepia; while the last one would be more interesting in colour. The second in an interesting study in human made pattern so it is goos as is.
Re: 3 Quicky B & WsGo the fish eye shot. Love that bridge effort Peter.
Regards Colin
Cameras, lenses and a lust for life
Re: 3 Quicky B & WsGoing with the flow...................the 3rd one is very nice. Its like your looking down on earth from the international space station. ( hmmm, maybe I should stay away from the cookies)
"Old school" (Olympus OM 1&2SP )
Re: 3 Quicky B & WsThe first and the last are appealing but I find the second one a bit boring and clichéd, even though it is good in B&W.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
Re: 3 Quicky B & WsThanks for all the comments. I've yet to choose the colour images (I have maybe 30 different fisheye images with different angles), but here is #3 in colour immediately prior to the B & W conversion. Note that it's not necessarily my final colour PP on the image since I'm a perfectionist and this was done to make a good B & W rather than a good colour image.
I'm still not sure if I prefer the B & W or the colour although I'm leaning toards the b & W as being starker and a little more compelling.
Gerry - that one is as composed - taken with my 28-70 f2.8.
Craig - I see space station in this one too hence the caption I used on the B & W. Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Re: 3 Quicky B & WsAll good Peter, but the third image (in B&W) is outstanding!!!
Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
Previous topic • Next topic
15 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|