Oh no!Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
18 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Oh no!All the images I took before I bought this lens suck
I went out to buy a 17-55, thought I could talk myself down to a Tamron 17-50, somehow ended up with a Nikon 24-70 f2.8. Not sure how that happened. Luckily I had a model or 3 handy to try it out on. Last edited by darklightphotography on Wed Sep 02, 2009 5:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Oh no!stunning image.
tis a great performing lens. not just in its optical performance but the startling speed of the AF. once you have one of these, whenever i use something like an 85/1.4 i feel like launching it out the window cos they are slow as all hell in comparison. EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
Re: Oh no!Absolutely amazing image! The 24-70 is definitely worth the money!
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Re: Oh no!I have to give my loaner back to Geoff, and, whilst I couldn't get the focus trapping technique to work, I found the lens, with its blistering AF and razor sharpness a joy to use. It also has a reasonably impressive close-focussing distance.
Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Re: Oh no!Yes it's an absolutely stunning lens, and great photo.
I think i never seen the full potential of my 24-70 until it met my D3, was a brilliant lens on my D200 but it's just out of this world on the D3. Congrats on the acquisition Adam Please don't use or edit my images.
D200x2, kit lens, Sigma 105mm f2.8, Nikkor 50mm F1.4, SB600, SB800, Sigma 70-200 f2.8, Sigma 1.4x TC, 2x TC, Sigma 120-300 f2.8
Re: Oh no!Congrates for the new purchase!! i wish i have spare cash to buy this lens too
Stunning picture mate Cheers,
Adrian Nikon user
Re: Oh no!Stunning indeed!
MAybe you can give us a tutorial on skin processing? Or maybe the skin is naturally like this?
Re: Oh no!Kevin,
The model, pp and lens is stunning. Brilliant work. This lens needs to be added to the Nikon Legend stable. fozzie
When people ask what equipment I use - I tell them my eyes.
Re: Oh no!Fantastic work. I don't know whether it is your skill, the lens, the gorgeous model or a combination of all three (most likely the latter) but this is a beautiful image.
Re: Oh no!Looking at this again, bar the lack of CA, this picture is nothing to do with the lens.
Re: Oh no!Great shot, razor sharp.
Craig
Lifes journey is not to arrive at our grave in a well preserved body but, rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting, "Wow what a ride." D70s, D300, 70-300ED, 18-70 Kit Lens, Nikkor 105 Micro. Manfrotto 190Prob Ball head. SB800 x 2.
Re: Oh no!It may have been serendipity but it did you well. I also have this lens and am constantly suprised by its image quality and speed. Beautifully taken portrait. Can't believe how that Uri (microstock fame) thought it not quite up to standard
cheers marco
Re: Oh no!
Not much really, her skin is mostly like the pic naturally. Some smoothing in Lightroom, and some healing brush to finish. The lighting is the key - for this I used a big softbox above and about 4 feet in front.
Re: Oh no!Very very nice - you are setting a high standard for us learners
DebT DebT
"so many dreams - so little time "
Re: Oh no!Kevin,
As nice as this image is, I don't like the colours you have. It's a little too warm for my taste: she has pink teeth, and likewise, the whites of her eyes also suffer from a pink hue. This is coming from someone who likes warm tones in images, so perhaps a tad too far? g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Re: Oh no!adding a little cyan will clean this image up.......
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer.... Removing objects that do not belong... happy for the comments, but .....Please DO NOT edit my image..... http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
Re: Oh no!I appreciate Gary's critical eye. (: How about the reflection of the flash umbrella or whatever in her eyes - is that desirable?
Previous topic • Next topic
18 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|