Jodie

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Jodie

Postby Jase555 on Mon Sep 14, 2009 10:23 pm

my gf Jo was kind enough to let me practice a new area of photography... and let me post some tasteful examples... even tho I had busted the most suitable lens and only had the 70 and some dodgy natural light... hence most shots were at iso1600...

looking for some C/C, never tried this before, obv some others that she wouldn't let me post, but she is happy with these...

Image

Image

Image

Image
Proud Pentax user!

Images of life, land & speed
http://www.555images.com
User avatar
Jase555
Member
 
Posts: 73
Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2008 9:02 pm
Location: Liverpool, Sydney

Re: Jodie

Postby Photopotamus on Mon Sep 14, 2009 11:55 pm

Jase,

I'm a self-confessed newb too... So here's my $0.02.

Number 1 - Is too far out of focus (or perhaps the focus is somewhere other than the face?). I also think that ISO 1600 is too high for this.

Number 2 - Not sure what the aim for this one is. Again, lack of focus / focal point..?

Number 3 - Better, but the light in the background is distracting. The black stocking sort of interrupts the flow. :? I think if you get the opportunity to reshoot, you might try a different pose or angle. Perhaps we should both legs?

Number 4 - I think this is the best of the lot. till, I'd like to see more color, or a fully B&W process. There seems to be a hint of colour in her face..?

For what it's worth, I think 70mm is a legit focal length for portraits. In fact have a look at some of the Newtown shots @ 85mm. Congrats on the opporortunity to explore "boudoir" poses. There is a whole world of possibility! :)
Canon 450D/ 18-55 IS "Kit Lens" / 55-250 IS "Kit Lens 2" / 17-85 EF-S / Nifty 50 II

Q: Can you give me some information about hippo racing in Australia? (USA)
A: Sure, the hippo racing is every Tuesday night in Kings Cross. Come naked.
User avatar
Photopotamus
Member
 
Posts: 65
Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 10:55 am
Location: Neutral Bay, NSW

Re: Jodie

Postby surenj on Tue Sep 15, 2009 1:41 am

These are great for your first attempt indeed. You are lucky to have a willing subject who will let you have another go.

I think photopotamus has given you some great critique.

Technicalities aside,

I quite like the first pose. perhaps try to get more light in to the area that you want to emphasise. [I feel that you could have used that lamp to focus the light]

The third pose is also very good. Perhaps more light on the facial expression.

I don't like the last one with the blotchy pink on the face. If you trying to evoke vulnerarability, that does come through, but the colors are just off putting.
User avatar
surenj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7197
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Artarmon NSW

Re: Jodie

Postby ian.bertram on Tue Sep 15, 2009 3:13 pm

Hi, and well done. There';s nothing like trying something new to stretch you boundaries a little.
I agree with all the comments above. I think that numbers 1 and 3 are the best shots. I'd maybe try shooting with a tripod so you can increase your depth of field (or maybe also switching to a prime 50mm 1.8- they're cheap and sharp). That way your could focus on the face but still get some of the body sharp. Number 3 is also good, but I'd try to shoot without the lamp in shot as it's a little distracting. Low light shooting is a real art form- when you've got it sorted out tell me how.
User avatar
ian.bertram
Member
 
Posts: 188
Joined: Sat Jun 27, 2009 7:35 pm
Location: Panania, South Western Sydney, NSW

Re: Jodie

Postby chrisk on Tue Sep 15, 2009 4:00 pm

#1 is imo, not just good, its absolutely superb. i freakin love it. that shot is made for a large canvas.
#2 is a little too abstract for my tastes but i like the tones
#3 that light needed to be on her face or upper body
#4...not sure what to say about this one. i don't quite get it.
EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
User avatar
chrisk
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3317
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:50 pm
Location: Oyster Bay, Sydney

Re: Jodie

Postby Jase555 on Tue Sep 15, 2009 7:16 pm

Thanks for the comments and feedback guys. Rooz, #1 is my favourite as well. I was going for a spontaneous 'getting ready' or candid type high/low key shot. Out of focus was deliberate but maybe a touch over done. I'm happy with this one nonetheless.

Agreed number 2 has no real focus, again going for some funky lighting tones, and liked the silhouette of her hair, this is cropped from a full body silhouette that works much better, but that shot was rejected for public view lol.... :lol:

Number 3 I have a few variations of. I deliberately chose a version with low-light on her face and the stocking on the lamp, however will have a play and upload another to get opinions on.

I'll also upload a retouched version of #4. You're right Surenj, I was trying to provoke a bit of vulnerability, but the desat was rushed and I can see blotches and deathly skin near the shoulders... I think the full colour may work, it has warmer tones and a different feel.
Proud Pentax user!

Images of life, land & speed
http://www.555images.com
User avatar
Jase555
Member
 
Posts: 73
Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2008 9:02 pm
Location: Liverpool, Sydney


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques