going batty

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

going batty

Postby LaurieE on Sat Sep 26, 2009 12:49 am

well - I have to be brave and post some pics sooner or later.

these were taken down by the yarra the other day at lunchtime.

I am surprised by just how many flying foxes there are in this area.

I learned a few things.

I need a longer lens to do this properly.

It is really hard to point a lens straight up and hold it steady - even with VR!

It doesn;t take much to make these guys take flight

any and all comments to help improve are very welcome.

Image

photo removed to comply with 4 photo rule (sorry :oops: ) http://i58.photobucket.com/albums/g244/ ... 502of5.jpg

Image

Image

Image
Last edited by LaurieE on Sat Sep 26, 2009 1:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Laurie

Nikon D90, lenses and stuff
User avatar
LaurieE
Member
 
Posts: 59
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Lysterfield, Vic

Re: going batty

Postby DebT on Sat Sep 26, 2009 7:11 am

I like the first three crisp,clear, exposed OK with nice eye contact , interesting shots showing plenty of detail
the other two contain too many OOF distractions..no matter how long our current lens we all want a longer one so join the club PS you may want to remove one to stick with the four shots per post rule
DebT
DebT
"so many dreams - so little time "
User avatar
DebT
Senior Member
 
Posts: 812
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 4:58 am
Location: Adelaide SA

Re: going batty

Postby gstark on Sat Sep 26, 2009 8:14 am

Hi Laurie,

Mostly, these are great, but (and this is easier said than done) marred ever so slightly because of the backgrounds' and foregrounds' intrusions into the images.

Look first at the third image. In this one you have managed to isolate the subject with just a bit of branch and then the plain blue sky as the background, and with no distracting elements. For extra credit, you have nailed the exposure and focus, to the point where we can see that this little critter is hanging on to the branch by just four of his five toes!

Great stuff, but now look at the other images, and try to see if any of them are a s pleasing to look at, if any of them are easy to look at ...

As I said, getting that clear viewpoint, and the subject, all in proper alignment ... easier said than done. And that's your challenge.

Your first one.

Now, let's remove your awb setting too, if you please. I'm going to climb out on one of those distracting branches and say that these were shot using awb on your camera. Look at the variance in the colours in the sky for starters: I'll bet that you had a glorious clear blue sky when these were shot, and that the sky did not display any of the colour variations that we're seeing in these images. :)

One of the major features of making images is that we need to relearn how we see things. On a clear bright sunny day, two things are fact: you may set a constant exposure (once an EV has been determined) and likewise, you can shoot using a constant, predetermined wb setting.

So, great work, and the really good news is that as good as these are, you know that you can do even better. :)
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Re: going batty

Postby LaurieE on Sat Sep 26, 2009 1:57 pm

thanks guys - great comments.

guilty as charged - AWB was indeed used. Have not yet got into the habit of changing it to suit the conditions.

its funny when it is pointed out how distracting those branches and other elements are.

I tried to not get too many of the creatures in the same shot (at times there were up to 8 or 9 on the same branch!) and trying to focus on the subjects that the other stuff was just there and I did not "see it" at the time - thanks for pointing out.

also - one photo removed. sorry - missed that rule. :oops:
Laurie

Nikon D90, lenses and stuff
User avatar
LaurieE
Member
 
Posts: 59
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Lysterfield, Vic

Re: going batty

Postby gstark on Sat Sep 26, 2009 3:11 pm

LaurieE wrote:I tried to not get too many of the creatures in the same shot (at times there were up to 8 or 9 on the same branch!)


Good decision there. That would have made the shots very different. And probably not as good. Up to three would probably be doable, but again, you're working with compositional challenges that could make things really tough.


and trying to focus on the subjects that the other stuff was just there and I did not "see it" at the time - thanks for pointing out.


That's one of the hardest things to learn - to take a second or two before releasing the shutter, and scan your viewfinder to see what, exactly, you are going to be getting in your images.

When shooting people out of doors, for instance, is there a tree or a telegraph pole growing out of the top of their head? Is there a dog, or a drunkard, (or a drunk dog) running in the background of that romantic, seaside shot of your bride and groom? Litter on the ground? Or a trashcan just off to the side?


also - one photo removed. sorry - missed that rule. :oops:


Not a problem, but thank you.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques