Flower

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Flower

Postby ATJ on Thu Mar 03, 2005 2:56 pm

Image

D70 with 60mm Micro Nikkor, SB-24 mounted on bracket.

f32, 1/80s Speedlight on manual 1/16 power.
User avatar
ATJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3982
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:44 am
Location: Blue Mountains, NSW

Postby MHD on Thu Mar 03, 2005 2:59 pm

Nice flower... technically great: Exposure, WB, sharpness etc..

A little to "neat and in the middle" for my tastes...
New page
http://www.potofgrass.com
Portfolio...
http://images.potofgrass.com
Comments and money always welcome
User avatar
MHD
Moderator
 
Posts: 5829
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 8:51 pm
Location: Chicago Burbs

Postby ATJ on Thu Mar 03, 2005 3:17 pm

MHD wrote:A little to "neat and in the middle" for my tastes...


I agree, but with the background, shifting it off centre looked odd.
User avatar
ATJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3982
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:44 am
Location: Blue Mountains, NSW

Postby Greg B on Thu Mar 03, 2005 3:21 pm

I reckon it works very well naitm. This is a perfect example of where the Matt K compositional imperative really shines.
Greg - - - - D200 etc

Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
User avatar
Greg B
Moderator
 
Posts: 5938
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 7:14 pm
Location: Surrey Hills, Melbourne

Postby ATJ on Thu Mar 03, 2005 4:13 pm

And other (well techincally multiple flowers):
Image

D70 with 60mm Micro Nikkor, SB-24 mounted on bracket.

f25, 1/100s Speedlight on manual 1/8 power.
User avatar
ATJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3982
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:44 am
Location: Blue Mountains, NSW

Postby stubbsy on Thu Mar 03, 2005 4:17 pm

I like both images, first one is a little better & I like neat & in the middle for shots like this.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby ATJ on Thu Mar 03, 2005 4:26 pm

And one more:

Image

D70 with 60mm Micro Nikkor, SB-24 mounted on bracket.

f32, 1/100s Speedlight on manual 1/16 power.
User avatar
ATJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3982
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:44 am
Location: Blue Mountains, NSW

Postby bwhinnen on Thu Mar 03, 2005 4:41 pm

They're great.

Can you get closer on the first one? I'd love to see the pattern in the centre.

Cheers
Brett
User avatar
bwhinnen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1234
Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2004 11:12 am
Location: Cornubia, Brisbane

Postby ATJ on Thu Mar 03, 2005 4:56 pm

bwhinnen wrote:Can you get closer on the first one? I'd love to see the pattern in the centre.


Certainly... if it wasn't pouring with rain at the moment. :x
User avatar
ATJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3982
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:44 am
Location: Blue Mountains, NSW

Postby Nicole on Thu Mar 03, 2005 5:48 pm

It's an excellent lens and those are some nice shots. I personally like your composition on the first one. What sort of bracket do you use?
Nicole
Web Site
Nicole
Senior Member
 
Posts: 569
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 9:54 pm
Location: Melbourne

Postby kipper on Thu Mar 03, 2005 5:53 pm

Very nice, I so want a macro lense now.

Thanks ATJ for showing me the usefulness of the 60MM micro. Given all the talk, I thought the 105MM micro was the macro lense of choice. However you have shown me otherwise.
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK

Postby ATJ on Thu Mar 03, 2005 6:11 pm

Nicole,

It is a DIY bracket that I made years ago for my FE2.

Image

It is basically two pieces of aluminium with a Hama hot shoe ball joint. It attaches to the tripod socket and the SB-24 is connected with an SC-17 cable.

This is only a temporary setup. A friend is in NY at the moment and is getting me a small slave attachment which I can use on an even smaller manual flash. Although, with the success of this, I might keep using it.
User avatar
ATJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3982
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:44 am
Location: Blue Mountains, NSW

Postby Onyx on Thu Mar 03, 2005 6:31 pm

Nice lens ATJ - the 60 Micro-Nikkor. Beaut, sharp and upto f/32!
User avatar
Onyx
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3631
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 6:51 pm
Location: westsyd.nsw.au

Postby kipper on Thu Mar 03, 2005 6:44 pm

ATJ could you possibly get a photo of the rear of the flash bracket where it bolts onto the bracket.

Now wondering if I could get this machine at a friends factory :)
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK

Postby PlatinumWeaver on Thu Mar 03, 2005 7:03 pm

ATJ wrote:And other (well techincally multiple flowers):
Image

D70 with 60mm Micro Nikkor, SB-24 mounted on bracket.

f25, 1/100s Speedlight on manual 1/8 power.


These are leaves :)
Nice though...
PlatinumWeaver / Dean
Asking the Stupid Questions
<a href="http://www.platinumweaver.net/" alt="PlatinumWeaver Homepage">http://www.platinumweaver.net/</a>
PlatinumWeaver
Member
 
Posts: 498
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 3:43 pm
Location: Melbourne, VIC

Postby ATJ on Thu Mar 03, 2005 7:39 pm

PlatinumWeaver wrote:These are leaves :)
Nice though...

The pink bits are leaves, yes, but the three central objects are flowers - 2 open and one closed.
User avatar
ATJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3982
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:44 am
Location: Blue Mountains, NSW

Postby ATJ on Fri Mar 04, 2005 6:34 am

It just dawned on me that I could simply crop the original photograph to show the detail of the centre.

Image

The original image was cropped and resized. This latest one is just a crop without resizing.

I will take another photograph today (weather withstanding) of just the detail of the centre of the flower.
User avatar
ATJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3982
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:44 am
Location: Blue Mountains, NSW

Postby ATJ on Sat Mar 05, 2005 11:22 am

OK, here's a close up of the flower. This was with the 60mm lens on its closest focusing distance. I have not cropped the image and just resized it from 3028x2000 to 757x500. It is a little over exposed but I couldn't get it any less than that as the flash was on 1/16 (lowest setting) and the lens was on f51.

Image
User avatar
ATJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3982
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:44 am
Location: Blue Mountains, NSW

Postby sirhc55 on Sat Mar 05, 2005 12:10 pm

kipper wrote:Very nice, I so want a macro lense now.

Thanks ATJ for showing me the usefulness of the 60MM micro. Given all the talk, I thought the 105MM micro was the macro lense of choice. However you have shown me otherwise.


Kipper - the 60mm is an excellent lens and you must ask yourself why do they come in other flavours. The answer is simple, as you go from 60 to 90 to 105 to 150 to 180 to 200 you can take the same photo but in each case further away from the subject.

If you want to take pics of flying insects the 60mm would be a lot harder to use than the other lenses. It’s a matter of physics.

ATJ - I like your shots a lot :D
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby flipfrog on Sat Mar 05, 2005 12:13 pm

the top pic works perfect as a bulls eye composition imo
nice shot...

did u bother doing any sharpending in PS tho?
it seems a bit soft to me.
User avatar
flipfrog
Senior Member
 
Posts: 626
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 8:33 pm
Location: Vancouver Canada

Postby dooda on Sat Mar 05, 2005 2:15 pm

Is it possible you missed the focus a tad on the leaves/flowers in the leaves thingy? The leaves seem sharp but the flowers seem soft or blured or something.

If you don't like the neat and in the middle thing, but it doesn't make sense to shoot it off centre, might I suggest moving in slightly closer to the subject, perhaps cutting off some of the petals in order to get a closer and more punchy image? Just a thought, that way you could probably open up the aperture a tad and get sharper pics.

Great job, looking forward to seeing some more of your pics.
love's first sighs are wisdom's last

Dave
http://www.flickr.com/photos/elton/
User avatar
dooda
Party Animal
 
Posts: 1591
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2004 11:47 am
Location: Vancouver, B.C. Canada


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques