Here are three different takes on the Anzac Bridge from the August AW 2x2 meet. To see any larger, just click the image. The first and last were taken with the 10.5 DX fisheye len.



Three AnzacsModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators 
		
			Forum rules 
	Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is. 
            Previous topic • Next topic 
			7 posts
			 • Page 1 of 1
		 
	
Three AnzacsFinally have some free time   
                  
            Here are three different takes on the Anzac Bridge from the August AW 2x2 meet. To see any larger, just click the image. The first and last were taken with the 10.5 DX fisheye len. ![]() ![]() ![]() Peter 
		Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com *** 
 Re: Three AnzacsThese have the usual Stubbsy look but I prefer the last for it's composition. I think the BW conversion has isolated the curves making it stronger... 
                  
            
		
 Re: Three AnzacsI agree with Suren. The graphic appearance is much more interesting plus the curves lead the eye(s) to the bridge. 
                  
            Chris 
		-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left 
 Re: Three Anzacs[quote="sirhc55" the curves lead the eye(s) to the bridge.[/quote] 
                  
              Possibly exaggerated by the use of the FE. Very nice. g. 
		Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet 
 Re: Three AnzacsPeter 
                  
            The last image intrigues me...it would look brilliant printed very large. The composition is beautifully executed and though I normally eschew fish-eye lens distortion in this case it works in a sophisticated way. A fine image! Regards
 
		Matt. K 
 Re: Three Anzacs
 ![]() almost like one of those illusion images with the footpath leading away in a distorted way, clever use of lines and curves Peter. gerry's photography journey 
		No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried. 
 Re: Three AnzacsGreat shots there Peter, the 3rd really does it for me. Simply amazing how the fish has made those leading lines so much stronger. 
                  
            Now that I have finally gotten my Tokina 10-17 you have provided me with more motivation to get out and about with it. Cameron 
		Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project 
 
            Previous topic • Next topic  
			7 posts
			 • Page 1 of 1
		 
	
 |