P O R T R A I T S : need your opinions

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

P O R T R A I T S : need your opinions

Postby flipfrog on Thu Mar 03, 2005 9:50 pm

i want to pick a few of these to display...
any of them stand out more than others?
thanks in advance for your input...

1.
Image


2.
Image


3.
Image


4.
Image


5.
Image


6.
Image


7.
Image


8.
Image


9.
Image


10.
Image


11.
Image


12.
Image


13.
Image


14.
Image


15.
Image
Last edited by flipfrog on Fri Mar 04, 2005 5:11 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
flipfrog
Senior Member
 
Posts: 626
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 8:33 pm
Location: Vancouver Canada

Postby MHD on Thu Mar 03, 2005 9:54 pm

WOW WOW..

I am mightly humbled...

My choices: 1 & 6

wow wow
New page
http://www.potofgrass.com
Portfolio...
http://images.potofgrass.com
Comments and money always welcome
User avatar
MHD
Moderator
 
Posts: 5829
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 8:51 pm
Location: Chicago Burbs

Postby cyanide on Thu Mar 03, 2005 10:07 pm

My favourite shot is #15, but I also like 1 and 9 - lovely portraits... IMHO.

Edit: Have to add that I would have said 3 except I find the bright highlight on her nose a bit distracting.... but another lovely shot.
cyanide
Member
 
Posts: 426
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 4:35 pm
Location: Cairns, QLD

Postby bwhinnen on Thu Mar 03, 2005 10:34 pm

1, 6, 8, 9, 12 and 14 :)

Hmm doesn't help narrow it down does it.

Out of those in order my comments;

9. I really like the pose, the lighting is subtle enough to lose a lot to shadow, but defined enough to make out her nose (even with the shadow).

6. The look is saying something, it's almost "You want me to what?" Or is that the lighting over the brow line? The hair gives her that "here I am in my glorious beauty" look. It's a shame the left shoulder is so high up and got lost in the hair.

1. A classic really. I know it's really good. The slight parting of the lips with a hint of smile.

12. Black and white :) But this is a thought provocing potrait, she is standing contemplating something, the concrete with exposed reo bar to the right speaks of a devastation she could be thinking of.

8. I like black and white portraits, ok so her shoulder is too high and the left eye a little too closed, but I like the pose.

14. I don't know what it is, I think it's the blue sky leading down to pale blue and the models blue jeans leading up to the pale blue that drew me in with the angular lines of the architecture.

On the other hand;

7. would have got a big look in but for the hair over the face, other than that distraction I think this one would have it hands down, it's different, yet shows that she is definately a she and is very striking.

4. I would have liked to see a little more definition on her face, it's a beautiful shot as it is and that may have added, but it may have detracted as well.

Sorry for a lengthy post, but I really think they are wonderful and you've done some great shots with the blonde model.

Cheers
Brett
User avatar
bwhinnen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1234
Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2004 11:12 am
Location: Cornubia, Brisbane

Postby johndec on Thu Mar 03, 2005 10:36 pm

No 1 for sure. Tweak the highlights on #3 and it's a winner too :D
User avatar
johndec
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1327
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 11:24 pm
Location: Sans Souci, Sydney...D200....

Postby xorl on Thu Mar 03, 2005 10:43 pm

I'm not a big fan of selective desaturation, but thats just personal preference.
I like the stark contrast between the black/red on 4,7,9. The frame on 11 is cool (the pic is good too :) ).
Wow.
Mark
User avatar
xorl
Member
 
Posts: 391
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2005 11:07 am
Location: Sydney, NSW

Postby redline on Thu Mar 03, 2005 11:43 pm

Hi Flipfrog,
I like the poses in your studio shots.
however you have to becarful not to blow out your highlights in a couple of your shots. unless that was the intendtion.
3.
5.
10.
shot 2. has is a little dark in the left corner prehaps a white reflector? to lighten up the skin tones.
the desaturation in 13. is pretty weak and looks uneven iam afraid.
Life's pretty straight without drifting
http://www.puredrift.com
redline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1370
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:36 pm
Location: Melbourne

Postby Onyx on Fri Mar 04, 2005 2:13 am

1 person's opinion - feel free to ignore:

#1 looks good. However I'd like to see a little more separation between the brown hair and black top.

There seems to be something wrong with the skin tones in #2.

I don't feel 8 works - overexposure in B&W stuck out.

11 I like the simplicity of it.

13 the colour elements have too much saturation contrasted to the B&W bits.

14 I like. Although I'm not sure if the un-straight verticals were meant to be straight or on a trendy slope.

15 is great. Needs more OOF front grass strands to enhance the 'mood' of it IMHO.
User avatar
Onyx
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3631
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 6:51 pm
Location: westsyd.nsw.au

Postby NetMagi on Fri Mar 04, 2005 3:16 am

3,7,15 are my favs. some have some technical issues with exposure, etc. but the composure is dead on. They're soo eye-friendly I could stare all day

-Rich
User avatar
NetMagi
Member
 
Posts: 243
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 1:45 am
Location: Jim Thorpe, PA, US

Postby dooda on Fri Mar 04, 2005 3:59 am

1 is the winner but the hair needs a little more detail is all. The rest are great, although I really don't like BW with Colour subjects.

Also I can see where you're going with the shadows on the face, but IMO I'd rather see a little bit of detail, while retaining the drama of it (easier said than done I know).
love's first sighs are wisdom's last

Dave
http://www.flickr.com/photos/elton/
User avatar
dooda
Party Animal
 
Posts: 1591
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2004 11:47 am
Location: Vancouver, B.C. Canada

Postby flipfrog on Fri Mar 04, 2005 5:07 am

thanks guys....

i had big problem with blown out highlights....
im not sure i can do much to pic 3's nose, but it was one of my favs too :(

any suggestions for PP?

and my other question, do u guys think number 8 would have worked better in colour? or is it DONE either way... ?

p.s. not many people mentioned it, but one of my favs is still #12
User avatar
flipfrog
Senior Member
 
Posts: 626
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 8:33 pm
Location: Vancouver Canada

Postby Nicole on Fri Mar 04, 2005 6:29 am

1 and 11 are my favourites. You've definitely got some great ones there. If you've got the most recent version of photoshop you could use the shadow/highlights tool to try and reduce the blown out highlights. If not, there is another which i can explain later if you want to know (have to get ready for work now!).
Nicole
Web Site
Nicole
Senior Member
 
Posts: 569
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 9:54 pm
Location: Melbourne

Postby flipfrog on Fri Mar 04, 2005 6:47 am

Nicole:
yes! please share!

...and i have 7.0 not CS and cannot find the shadow highlights tool u r talking about... ?
User avatar
flipfrog
Senior Member
 
Posts: 626
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 8:33 pm
Location: Vancouver Canada

Postby Oneputt on Fri Mar 04, 2005 8:55 am

Like them very much, but simply do not feel qualified to make any comments.
User avatar
Oneputt
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3174
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 3:58 pm
Location: Stuck in traffic Maroochydore.

Postby Nicole on Fri Mar 04, 2005 5:46 pm

Dee,

The shadow/highlight tool is only available in CS. Definitely a handy tool to have and does a much better job. You can do a similar thing (but not as good) in 7.0 as follows:

1. Select the areas you want to darken. I usually use the magic wand.
2. Copy and paste the selection. A new layer will be created.
3. Set the blending mode of the layer to Multiply
4. Adjust the opacity until it looks more blended/normal

If the highlights are too blown then it's probably not going to do much. Can't remember where I read it but probably in a book somewhere.
Nicole
Web Site
Nicole
Senior Member
 
Posts: 569
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 9:54 pm
Location: Melbourne

Postby SoCal Steve on Fri Mar 04, 2005 6:42 pm

IMO #4 is the strongest. #'s 5,6,10 and 15 are also appealing, but not quite as strong as #4.

Always enjoy getting to see your work, Dee.
User avatar
SoCal Steve
Senior Member
 
Posts: 500
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2005 6:25 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques