new shotModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
new shotWhat do you guys think?
body: nikon d200, d70s, f4s, f601.
lens:nikon 35-70mm f2.8, 70-300mm f4-5.6, 10.5mm f2.8, 20mm f2.8, 28mm f2.8, 50mm f1.8. flash: nikon sb600, sunpak 383 (x1), sunpak 555 (x4), pocketwizard plus II (x4) jamesdwade.com dishonourclothing.com
Re: new shotI think the guy on the bike is either stupid or has nerves of steel ...but the photo's great and your lighting choice has done a great job highlighting the rider and framing him at the same time
But I'm a bit lost as to what he is actually doing (ok jumping , but what?) ? or what the relationship,if any, with the 'cement' curves framing the shot ? ...but I'm a granny who rides her bike on flat roads so not 'with it' but it's certainly made me interested enough to look and ask questions .. DebT DebT
"so many dreams - so little time "
Re: new shotApologies I failed to explain what's going on, which is a fair question.
Basically he is leaving the quarter pipe on the right, doing a 360 degree spin taking his hands off midway, and landing backwards on the bank on the right. It sounds complicated, but in a magazine it's fixed with the caption '360 old school no hander to fakie across the channel' body: nikon d200, d70s, f4s, f601.
lens:nikon 35-70mm f2.8, 70-300mm f4-5.6, 10.5mm f2.8, 20mm f2.8, 28mm f2.8, 50mm f1.8. flash: nikon sb600, sunpak 383 (x1), sunpak 555 (x4), pocketwizard plus II (x4) jamesdwade.com dishonourclothing.com
Re: new shotBrilliant capture James!
How many goes did you have before you got this keeper? The only thing I could think of would be to drag the shutter and make the background lights streaky to add to the sense of movement. I guess it's hard to play around when you need to nail a shot like this. If the rider misbalances, you may have to wait several months before you could re-shoot.?
Re: new shotThanks James appreciate the explination
- makes your timing even more spot on - just don't hope you get any splat shots Deb DebT
"so many dreams - so little time "
Re: new shot
Interesting subject..... good framing.... great lighting. My first thought was the chap is a bit 'squished' in the frame... but after looking at it a bit more I think you've nailed it.
ummmm.... yeh.... ahhhhhh..... one of those. I think we used to call them 'jumps' Nice work James. http://www.markcrossphotography.com - A camera, glass, and some light.
Re: new shotJames,
How did you solve problems with focus? [apart from using Nikon ]
Re: new shot
I think we shot this maybe 3 or 4 times to get the timing and framing right. It was quite difficult because i was lying down underneath, and trying to keep my feet and legs out of the shot. And trying not to create any shadows from the lighting! It was also very dark, and I couldn't really see where his arms were when I was looking through the viewfinder. I was pretty much guessing, so it was lucky to get this shot in only 3 or 4 tries.
With the 10.5mm fisheye, the maximum focusing distance before infiniti is 0.50cm. So basically if you are further than half a meter away from your subject, it will be sharp and in focus. It's pretty handy but it makes it more or less impossible to limit depth of field unless you are very, very close to what you're shooting. In general (with other lenses) I pre-focus where I expect the rider to be when I want to take the shot. This works in about 95% of situations for me. body: nikon d200, d70s, f4s, f601.
lens:nikon 35-70mm f2.8, 70-300mm f4-5.6, 10.5mm f2.8, 20mm f2.8, 28mm f2.8, 50mm f1.8. flash: nikon sb600, sunpak 383 (x1), sunpak 555 (x4), pocketwizard plus II (x4) jamesdwade.com dishonourclothing.com
Re: new shotVery interesting shot...did he land it?
I was just about to ask about the lens, but the 10.5 makes great sense, and the pipe has hidden the distortion (or did you de-fish it?) I would like to see a bit more space above the rider, but you have done VERY WELL. Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|