A discussion forum - and more - for users of Digital Single Lens Reflex cameras.
Post processing questionModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Post processing question
I did a family shoot earlier this week. I was quite pleased with the results although I haven't got the prints back yet. Here's my question, which will most probably be obvious to those who know these things.
When I opened this raw file in Canon DPP, adjusted the WB to "flash", the skin tones and image detail were excellent. I saved the file as a TIF, then re-opened it in Photoshop CS1, and the image looks completely different eg nowhere near as good. Is CS1 particularly bad at rendering images, or is Canon DPP just good? Or am I missing something altogether here? Any input will be appreciated, with thanks. Ozi.  President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
Re: Post processing question
My first thought would be to check the colour space.
g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Re: Post processing question
Is this the same as "color picker"? President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
Re: Post processing question
Here are my current settings: North American General Purpose Defaults Working space: sRGB IEC61966-2.1 Color management: Preserve Embedded Profiles President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
Re: Post processing question
Gary you've got me thinking. I changed the RGB settings to "Monitor RGB - VX2235wm calibrated" and it has made all the difference. Many thanks. President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
Re: Post processing question
I do like to live dangerously.  Glad I was able to help. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|
