Mt Wellington PanosModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Mt Wellington PanosAs promised I am posting a few pano's taken when I went up to Mt Wellington. These were both 12 image stitches taken using the D60 and the Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8 and stitched using AutoPanoPro with some saturation adjustments made in CS2.
I am personally not sure what is wrong with these images, and will admit that I think they are missing something. Anyone care to share any ideas as to how to improve them? (click through for a 5000pxl image) Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Re: Mt Wellington PanosFWOAR.......
Canon | Sony | Panasonic | Tamron | Sigma
My photography is still developing. Don't be so negative! http://www.photomarcs.com
Re: Mt Wellington Panos
the problem I found with the old Mount Wellington was the lack of a foreground subject, so the best you end up with is view on the city and some rocks to frame it.... In regard to your pano, methinks it needs a bit of PP love to get that colour cast correct, way too blue for my liking, ther is also some nice detail hiding in those darker areas. In terms of composition, there are so many ways to get this shot - you were lucky you had a very nice weather, for reference below are a couple i took earlier this year. gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: Mt Wellington PanosI have never figured out the art of panography myself. I think Gerry's suggestions are good ones. Also his rework is much better than having a mono color (blue) as in the first image. Maybe tone down the brightness a touch in the foreground though.
What focal length did you shoot Cameron? Also were these hand held? Also a problem here maybe that it's not a inherently fabulous scene to start with; Esp if you compare it to wineglass bay etc.
Re: Mt Wellington Panos
Gerry your bloody amazing....I couldnt be bothered to fix the colour cast, now I am going to have to....thanks mate
I was using 35mm and 40mm in these two, both handheld. I didnt bring a tripod to Hobart with me, mine are too heavy. I didnt get a chance to go to Wineglass Bay or Cradle Mountain (maybe an excuse for another trip!) Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Previous topic • Next topic
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|