The chair and the stareModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
The chair and the stareThree from the weekend
And this was probably dangerous Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/ My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
Re: The chair and the stareThe first image is a winner, i really like it, very prOn style Great pose, looks very natural and comfortable, the lightign is also very tidy and appropriate
The second image, the pose looks a bit strange to me, the third, I would be interested in seeing the unsat version, I am not convinced on the use of de-sat here... gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: The chair and the stareThanks Biggery for taking the time to comment on these images. I value the feedback. The desat was a bit of an experiment and I appreciate the critique.
An alternative pose from the shoot up against the tree is Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/ My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
Re: The chair and the stareI think the first "tree" photo is spoiled because the MM is looking off camera. If he were mirroring her look, I think it would be a cracker.
The second "tree" suffers from an unfortunate answer to the perennial question: "Does my bum look big in this?" I think it is the placement of his hand that does it. Of the three original posts, I prefer the third, but would be happier if it were full sat, or monochrome. As has been mentioned, the desat look does not help the shot. Greg
It's easy to be good... when there is nothing else to do
Re: The chair and the stareThe first is the pick for me, nice lighting, good exposure and the pose looks very relaxed. The others are not doing it for me, not sure why. I do like desaturated images but somehow it is not working here.
Fuji X-Pro1 | X-E1 | X-T1 | XF14 | XF23 | XF27 | XF35 | XF56 | XF60 | XF10-24 | XF18-55 | XF55-200 | MCEX-11
http://gmarshall.zenfolio.com http://xtographer.weebly.com
Re: The chair and the stareI think the first portrait is the best of what is currently being shown. The subject looks relaxed and displays self-assurance and confidence.
While the other pictures are also well taken, they lack the engaging attitude or personality of the first sitter. So perhaps to make them justice, you should show them as a separate set - indoors vs outdoors portraits. It is very hard not to compare them when seen toguether. PS. I've just realised you used flash lights and possibly reflectors. This harsh light took away the natural look that should be present in outdoors photography.
Re: The chair and the stare
stripes man, stripes!! strips should always be longitundinal (downards) not lateral (around the body) 'cause round stripes make you look fat ! It's the one thing i remember from the Asterix and Obelix cartoon... on another side note, both models are wearign stripe shirts - round stripes at that gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: The chair and the stare
Yep, except in this case, same outfit, but one works & the other has a bum look (pun intended ) That's why I think it is the positioning of the hand & possibly also the rotation of her body which is slightly different between the photos Greg
It's easy to be good... when there is nothing else to do
Re: The chair and the stareThanks for the discussion on these images guys. Its all valuable food for thought. The stripes were fairly hillarious because they both picked them independently. They caused me a few problems with Moire effects.
I was using single flash, diffused through diffuser panel, and also a soft box in a couple of images. Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/ My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|