The chair and the stare

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

The chair and the stare

Postby Willy wombat on Mon Nov 30, 2009 11:32 pm

Three from the weekend

Image

Image

And this was probably dangerous
Image
Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/
My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto
Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
User avatar
Willy wombat
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2284
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 10:47 pm
Location: Bentleigh, VIC Australia

Re: The chair and the stare

Postby biggerry on Fri Dec 04, 2009 11:12 am

The first image is a winner, i really like it, very prOn style :wink: Great pose, looks very natural and comfortable, the lightign is also very tidy and appropriate

The second image, the pose looks a bit strange to me, the third, I would be interested in seeing the unsat version, I am not convinced on the use of de-sat here...
gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
User avatar
biggerry
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5930
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney

Re: The chair and the stare

Postby Willy wombat on Sat Dec 05, 2009 3:36 pm

Thanks Biggery for taking the time to comment on these images. I value the feedback. The desat was a bit of an experiment and I appreciate the critique.

An alternative pose from the shoot up against the tree is
Image
Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/
My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto
Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
User avatar
Willy wombat
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2284
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 10:47 pm
Location: Bentleigh, VIC Australia

Re: The chair and the stare

Postby Mr Darcy on Sat Dec 05, 2009 6:18 pm

I think the first "tree" photo is spoiled because the MM is looking off camera. If he were mirroring her look, I think it would be a cracker.
The second "tree" suffers from an unfortunate answer to the perennial question: "Does my bum look big in this?" :cry: I think it is the placement of his hand that does it.
Of the three original posts, I prefer the third, but would be happier if it were full sat, or monochrome. As has been mentioned, the desat look does not help the shot.
Greg
It's easy to be good... when there is nothing else to do
User avatar
Mr Darcy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3414
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 11:35 pm
Location: The somewhat singed and blackened Blue Mountains

Re: The chair and the stare

Postby Geoff M on Mon Dec 07, 2009 10:13 am

The first is the pick for me, nice lighting, good exposure and the pose looks very relaxed. The others are not doing it for me, not sure why. I do like desaturated images but somehow it is not working here.
Fuji X-Pro1 | X-E1 | X-T1 | XF14 | XF23 | XF27 | XF35 | XF56 | XF60 | XF10-24 | XF18-55 | XF55-200 | MCEX-11

http://gmarshall.zenfolio.com

http://xtographer.weebly.com
User avatar
Geoff M
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1225
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 10:54 pm
Location: Tamborine Mountain QLD.

Re: The chair and the stare

Postby zafra52 on Mon Dec 07, 2009 11:17 am

I think the first portrait is the best of what is currently being shown. The subject looks relaxed and displays self-assurance and confidence.
While the other pictures are also well taken, they lack the engaging attitude or personality of the first sitter. So perhaps to make them justice, you should show them as a separate set - indoors vs outdoors portraits. It is very hard not to compare them when seen toguether. PS. I've just realised you used flash lights and possibly reflectors. This harsh light took away the natural look that should be present in outdoors photography.
User avatar
zafra52
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4827
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:22 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: The chair and the stare

Postby biggerry on Mon Dec 07, 2009 11:53 am

If he were mirroring her look, I think it would be a cracker.

:agree:

"Does my bum look big in this?"


stripes man, stripes!!

strips should always be longitundinal (downards) not lateral (around the body) 'cause round stripes make you look fat !

It's the one thing i remember from the Asterix and Obelix cartoon... 8) 8)

on another side note, both models are wearign stripe shirts - round stripes at that :wink: :wink:
gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
User avatar
biggerry
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5930
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney

Re: The chair and the stare

Postby Mr Darcy on Mon Dec 07, 2009 3:12 pm

biggerry wrote:
"Does my bum look big in this?"

stripes man, stripes!!

stripes should always be longitundinal (downards) not lateral (around the body) 'cause round stripes make you look fat !

Yep, except in this case, same outfit, but one works & the other has a bum look (pun intended :roll: ) That's why I think it is the positioning of the hand & possibly also the rotation of her body which is slightly different between the photos
Greg
It's easy to be good... when there is nothing else to do
User avatar
Mr Darcy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3414
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 11:35 pm
Location: The somewhat singed and blackened Blue Mountains

Re: The chair and the stare

Postby Willy wombat on Tue Dec 08, 2009 9:23 am

Thanks for the discussion on these images guys. :cheers: Its all valuable food for thought. The stripes were fairly hillarious because they both picked them independently. They caused me a few problems with Moire effects.

I was using single flash, diffused through diffuser panel, and also a soft box in a couple of images.
Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/
My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto
Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
User avatar
Willy wombat
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2284
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 10:47 pm
Location: Bentleigh, VIC Australia


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques