Over-the-top-wide-angle

With everyone getting new bodies, I think that separate section for you to proudly display your first image from your new acquisition is in order.

This applies to brand new bodies, as well as bodies that are simply newly acquired by you.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 800 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and no more than four images per post.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Over-the-top-wide-angle

Postby surenj on Tue Dec 08, 2009 12:00 am

I thought I'd go over the top and fall off the edge with the wide angle goodness. As usual, I would love to hear what you think of these. Thanks in advance for looking.


Electrifying to upgrade from a kit lens!
Image


Can't wait for some more sunrise shots
Image
User avatar
surenj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7197
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Artarmon NSW

Re: Over-the-top-wide-angle

Postby wendellt on Tue Dec 08, 2009 12:29 am

woohoo fellow lightjunkie
i like the 1st one awesome

the 2nd one is neat great capture
Wendell Levi Teodoro
My Agents
Press - Getty Images
Creative Rep - T.I.D. FashionID, DBP Productions & The Nest Agency
My Book - Zeduce
User avatar
wendellt
Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
 
Posts: 4078
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney

Re: Over-the-top-wide-angle

Postby biggerry on Tue Dec 08, 2009 7:53 am

nice work suren, great to see you got yourself an upgrade...

This should make for some sunrise fun...

The first product shot is very nice and creative...great stuff.. :up: :up:
gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
User avatar
biggerry
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5930
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney

Re: Over-the-top-wide-angle

Postby zafra52 on Tue Dec 08, 2009 9:20 am

The first one is great! And... so it's the second!
So, you finally went for the Canon lens. Someone
from my digital club, up here is Brisbane, advised
me (with lens) "...to stick to the brandname of the
camera because although you pay a bit more they
are generally better suited products."

P.S. You should sell the first to Canon for it has
lots of marketing potential.
User avatar
zafra52
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4827
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:22 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: Over-the-top-wide-angle

Postby ozimax on Tue Dec 08, 2009 9:29 am

This lens is the one thing stopping me from going to a FF body. It is sensational.

Great photos btw.
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
User avatar
ozimax
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5289
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW

Re: Over-the-top-wide-angle

Postby zafra52 on Tue Dec 08, 2009 10:14 am

I guess you would have considered the new 7D. This camera would give you the best of both formats.
User avatar
zafra52
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4827
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:22 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: Over-the-top-wide-angle

Postby photomarcs on Tue Dec 08, 2009 10:54 am

zafra52 wrote:I guess you would have considered the new 7D. This camera would give you the best of both formats.



IQ wise I'd stick with the 40D :D

but hey! you can't deny the ability to force a camera to do what you want it to do rather than it doing what it wants to :twisted: btw, Nice product shot Suren, big fan of the green :D
Canon | Sony | Panasonic | Tamron | Sigma
My photography is still developing.
Don't be so negative!
http://www.photomarcs.com
User avatar
photomarcs
Member
 
Posts: 417
Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 10:47 pm
Location: Liverpool, Sydney Australia

Re: Over-the-top-wide-angle

Postby ozimax on Tue Dec 08, 2009 11:01 am

zafra52 wrote:I guess you would have considered the new 7D. This camera would give you the best of both formats.


I have seriously considered the 7D, but I just have a question mark over it's IQ. It may be just me reading too many reviews. I spoke to a mate this morning who claimed that although he is very happy with camera's operation, the RAW files need a huge amount of processing to get a decent sharp image. Just his opinion, mind you.

Will keep considering.
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
User avatar
ozimax
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5289
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW

Re: Over-the-top-wide-angle

Postby surenj on Tue Dec 08, 2009 7:14 pm

wendellt wrote:woohoo fellow lightjunkie
i like the 1st one awesome

Thanks Wendell. Can't wait for the lightpainting meet. How bright are your lights? Myn are a little weak 10 seconds at 6.3 ISO 100.

biggerry wrote:This should make for some sunrise fun...

The first product shot is very nice and creative...great stuff..

Thanks Gerry. Sunrises are going to be more and less fun. This lens will struggle with the graduated filters a little. I may have to hand hold. :shock:

zafra52 wrote:P.S. You should sell the first to Canon for it has
lots of marketing potential.

Hmm... that's an idea!

ozimax wrote:This lens is the one thing stopping me from going to a FF body. It is sensational.

I am happy with the flare and CA which were my main concerns. IQ is similar in the Tamron but focusing is faster(For my purposes).

photomarcs wrote:but hey! you can't deny the ability to force a camera to do what you want it to do rather than it doing what it wants to

:mrgreen:

photomarcs wrote:IQ wise I'd stick with the 40D

It's too bad that they didn't just upgrade the 40D with video, faster shutter, focus instead of using this 18MP sensor! :roll:

ozimax wrote:I have seriously considered the 7D, but I just have a question mark over it's IQ

You echo my sentiments exactly. Dpreview does say the noise is comparable to D300s. I am going to wait until LR supports these files properly. No hurry for a body anyways. No money either.
User avatar
surenj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7197
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Artarmon NSW

Re: Over-the-top-wide-angle

Postby aim54x on Tue Dec 08, 2009 9:06 pm

Congrats on the purchase, I like the 2nd image...great colours.

RE: 7D IQ.....Marcus...what do you think about the noise now that you have been using one for awhile?
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42
Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black
Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
User avatar
aim54x
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7305
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
Location: Penshurst, Sydney

Re: Over-the-top-wide-angle

Postby surenj on Wed Dec 09, 2009 4:48 pm

aim54x wrote:Congrats on the purchase, I like the 2nd image...great colours.

Thanks Cameron.

aim54x wrote:RE: 7D IQ.....Marcus...what do you think about the noise now that you have been using one for awhile?

It's sad that we have to discuss dubious image quality on a brand new camera. I still remember the times when the Canon high ISO images were described as 'silky smoothand noise free'. Gone are those days.

Marcus, I would love to hear and see your results from this camera. [I know it will be biased due to your fanboy status :mrgreen: ]
User avatar
surenj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7197
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Artarmon NSW

Re: Over-the-top-wide-angle

Postby Killakoala on Fri Dec 11, 2009 8:28 pm

Both shots are really cool. I love the lighting in the first one though.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Re: Over-the-top-wide-angle

Postby surenj on Sat Dec 12, 2009 6:55 pm

Killakoala wrote:Both shots are really cool. I love the lighting in the first one though.


Thanks Killakoala. I lightpainted the first. :mrgreen: and combined two exposures.
User avatar
surenj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7197
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Artarmon NSW

Re: Over-the-top-wide-angle

Postby photomarcs on Wed Dec 16, 2009 8:37 am

aim54x wrote:Congrats on the purchase, I like the 2nd image...great colours.

RE: 7D IQ.....Marcus...what do you think about the noise now that you have been using one for awhile?



Noise Issue is now descirbed in my rant about the 7D.

Noise wise? Now, after more testing.. its proven its worth in "potential"

to me, the noise levels are high inconsistent, as you would all know, we like grainless images as well as grainy images, just has to suit the environment.

But I'm sad to say that 50% of the time it's not trustworthy. I have to take mine back to canon i think. Though Chris has asked if there's anyway for me to calibrate it myself. Canon techheads might not let me do that. haha might breach the warranty issue.

All in all, I'm happy with the camera, gotten used to the ergonomics as well as button placement moreso now.

Still.. you'd be surprised what a dud 7D can provide =D
Canon | Sony | Panasonic | Tamron | Sigma
My photography is still developing.
Don't be so negative!
http://www.photomarcs.com
User avatar
photomarcs
Member
 
Posts: 417
Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 10:47 pm
Location: Liverpool, Sydney Australia

Re: Over-the-top-wide-angle

Postby surenj on Fri Dec 18, 2009 2:09 am

photomarcs wrote:to me, the noise levels are high inconsistent

Sounds like a double edged sword Marcus. Hope it serves you well and looking forward to seeing more pictures from you.
User avatar
surenj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7197
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Artarmon NSW


Return to First Image