One versus self

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

One versus self

Postby surenj on Wed Dec 16, 2009 1:04 am

The remnants of the eternal struggle. :mrgreen:

For your critique as always. Thanks for your opinions.

Image
User avatar
surenj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7197
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Artarmon NSW

Re: One versus self

Postby craig.rohse on Wed Dec 16, 2009 7:14 am

I like it Suren

It's like a character from the latest Zombie movie.
"Old school" (Olympus OM 1&2SP )
User avatar
craig.rohse
Member
 
Posts: 221
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2009 9:16 am
Location: Austins Ferry, Hobart

Re: One versus self

Postby gstark on Wed Dec 16, 2009 7:47 am

Suren,

While a little of the photochopping you've done is obvious, I like this too. You are doing some great work of late, and your mind is working in overtime.

My only real niggle is that the reds on the lh side of the image (the edges of the hat, cheek and neck) are very typical of how easy it is to blow red highlights in digital photography. Reducing the intensity of the light source providing this light will help pull this back and give you more detail in this area.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Re: One versus self

Postby biggerry on Wed Dec 16, 2009 9:08 am

Suren, you been watching way too many spooky movies :shock:

Very creative on this one, as Gary mentioned the photochop is fairly obvious, however I reckon it would only take a small amount of tweaking to achieve that movie poster level!

I think there need to be a bit more clearance around the right eye (as the viewer looks at it) the white plastic layer needs to end around the eyebrow line.

Now I want to see the terminator version.... :up: :up:
gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
User avatar
biggerry
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5930
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney

Re: One versus self

Postby Big V on Wed Dec 16, 2009 11:57 am

Definately the terminator type look going on here - you will scare little children!!!
Canon
User avatar
Big V
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2301
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 1:37 am
Location: Adelaide

Re: One versus self

Postby devilla101 on Wed Dec 16, 2009 7:51 pm

:lol: lovin' it

Very interesting concept and well executed.
User avatar
devilla101
Senior Member
 
Posts: 604
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 1:48 pm
Location: Rockdale, Sydney, Australia

Re: One versus self

Postby biggerry on Wed Dec 16, 2009 10:03 pm

lovin' it


methinks this image would go well photochopped with devilla101's cockatoo island shot. Saw meets terminator... :up:
gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
User avatar
biggerry
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5930
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney

Re: One versus self

Postby aim54x on Wed Dec 16, 2009 10:05 pm

Great stuff, very interesting concept...would love to see more.
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42
Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black
Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
User avatar
aim54x
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7305
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
Location: Penshurst, Sydney

Re: One versus self

Postby surenj on Fri Dec 18, 2009 2:16 am

craig.rohse wrote:I like it Suren
gstark wrote:I like this too
biggerry wrote:way too many spooky movies :shock:
Big V wrote:you will scare little children!!!
aim54x wrote:very interesting concept

Thanks everyone. Your comments are much appreciated.

gstark wrote:photochopping you've done is obvious
biggerry wrote:photochop is fairly obvious

Where is the most obvious bit? I want to improve on it.

biggerry wrote:white plastic layer needs to end around the eyebrow line.

Will make some adjustments. I was using the actual mask so didn't have much room to move. The mask doesn't fit the face in real life. [he wears this for dancing!]

biggerry wrote:terminator version...

Done... Check out the terminator post. Thanks for the idea!! :cheers:

Some background. I had this shot in mind (less the cracks) before we started shooting. We shot the mask seperately in the same light and combined exposures. The crack was another photo blended with some texture.

gstark wrote:how easy it is to blow red highlights in digital photography

Thanks for the tip Gary. I never knew of this phenomenon!! Although the LCD didn't show blown highlights(nor does LR), I can't revcover detail from it!!! I will need to watch out for the future. As per usual, I overexpose and pull back in post to minimise noise from my ancient camera.
User avatar
surenj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7197
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Artarmon NSW

Re: One versus self

Postby biggerry on Fri Dec 18, 2009 7:30 am

Where is the most obvious bit? I want to improve on it.


well i thought the mask was a photochop :shock: man was i wrong...

Both scars need some blending in, also darkening them a bit (neck one) would also help and hide any incorrect detail :up:
gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
User avatar
biggerry
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5930
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney

Re: One versus self

Postby gstark on Fri Dec 18, 2009 8:40 am

surenj wrote:
gstark wrote:photochopping you've done is obvious
biggerry wrote:photochop is fairly obvious

Where is the most obvious bit? I want to improve on it.


For me, it's where the white plastic meets the skin. Around the lh side as wee look at the face, and within the gap for the eye.

It appears to me that it's a photochop, rather than a real image, but I can't offer any ideas on how to improve it.

gstark wrote:how easy it is to blow red highlights in digital photography

Thanks for the tip Gary. I never knew of this phenomenon!! Although the LCD didn't show blown highlights(nor does LR), I can't revcover detail from it!!! I will need to watch out for the future. As per usual, I overexpose and pull back in post to minimise noise from my ancient camera.


With red lighting, overexposing is not a good idea, because you will lose detail very quickly, That's why I don't like it when I get red stage lighting when I'm shooting theatre or band gigs or music festivals. You need to chimp carefully and try to pull the lighting back if you have control, or else push up some other light source, such as your on camera flash, to compensate.

It's a difficult task.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques