FroggieModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
FroggieNever seen one of these as close as this before. It landed in our garden looking a little distressed in the middle of the afternoon, I managed a couple of frames before it flew up high into a tree.
Funny looking tounge they have Fuji X-Pro1 | X-E1 | X-T1 | XF14 | XF23 | XF27 | XF35 | XF56 | XF60 | XF10-24 | XF18-55 | XF55-200 | MCEX-11
http://gmarshall.zenfolio.com http://xtographer.weebly.com
Re: FroggieNice sharp image you have there Geoff. The composition would have been a bit stronger if you'd had the bird looking into the frame rather than out of it. i.e. shift the bird to the left and perhaps have the closest eye on the left line of thirds.
Re: FroggieThe sharpness is amazing but I am left with wanting to see more of the owl's neck etc. The head appears just cut off a little.
Re: Froggie
Owl? It's a frogmouth which are in a different family from owls (and there are two families of owls). They also don't have much of a neck.
Re: FroggieWould love to have got a better angle/composition but unfortuanetly this was not possible.
The sharpness is due to the ever so versatile Nikkor 18-200 VR, which so many people slate for being a 'soft' lens. Fuji X-Pro1 | X-E1 | X-T1 | XF14 | XF23 | XF27 | XF35 | XF56 | XF60 | XF10-24 | XF18-55 | XF55-200 | MCEX-11
http://gmarshall.zenfolio.com http://xtographer.weebly.com
Re: FroggieThat is sharp, i dont like the 18-200 but i will admit that it is damn versatile.
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Re: Froggie
I for one don't care about the lens Geoff. As long as you can make the pictures you want to make. This one looks excellent from an optics point of view.
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|