Froggie

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Froggie

Postby Geoff M on Thu Dec 24, 2009 11:04 am

Never seen one of these as close as this before. It landed in our garden looking a little distressed in the middle of the afternoon, I managed a couple of frames before it flew up high into a tree.

Funny looking tounge they have :!:



Image
Fuji X-Pro1 | X-E1 | X-T1 | XF14 | XF23 | XF27 | XF35 | XF56 | XF60 | XF10-24 | XF18-55 | XF55-200 | MCEX-11

http://gmarshall.zenfolio.com

http://xtographer.weebly.com
User avatar
Geoff M
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1225
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 10:54 pm
Location: Tamborine Mountain QLD.

Re: Froggie

Postby ATJ on Thu Dec 24, 2009 12:19 pm

Nice sharp image you have there Geoff. The composition would have been a bit stronger if you'd had the bird looking into the frame rather than out of it. i.e. shift the bird to the left and perhaps have the closest eye on the left line of thirds.
User avatar
ATJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3982
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:44 am
Location: Blue Mountains, NSW

Re: Froggie

Postby surenj on Thu Dec 24, 2009 4:00 pm

The sharpness is amazing but I am left with wanting to see more of the owl's neck etc. The head appears just cut off a little.
User avatar
surenj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7197
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Artarmon NSW

Re: Froggie

Postby ATJ on Thu Dec 24, 2009 4:26 pm

surenj wrote:...see more of the owl's neck etc. The head appears just cut off a little.

Owl? It's a frogmouth which are in a different family from owls (and there are two families of owls). They also don't have much of a neck.
User avatar
ATJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3982
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:44 am
Location: Blue Mountains, NSW

Re: Froggie

Postby Geoff M on Thu Dec 24, 2009 5:33 pm

Would love to have got a better angle/composition but unfortuanetly this was not possible.

The sharpness is due to the ever so versatile Nikkor 18-200 VR, which so many people slate for being a 'soft' lens.
Fuji X-Pro1 | X-E1 | X-T1 | XF14 | XF23 | XF27 | XF35 | XF56 | XF60 | XF10-24 | XF18-55 | XF55-200 | MCEX-11

http://gmarshall.zenfolio.com

http://xtographer.weebly.com
User avatar
Geoff M
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1225
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 10:54 pm
Location: Tamborine Mountain QLD.

Re: Froggie

Postby aim54x on Fri Dec 25, 2009 5:44 pm

That is sharp, i dont like the 18-200 but i will admit that it is damn versatile.
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42
Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black
Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
User avatar
aim54x
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7305
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
Location: Penshurst, Sydney

Re: Froggie

Postby surenj on Fri Dec 25, 2009 8:39 pm

Geoff M wrote:The sharpness is due to the ever so versatile Nikkor 18-200 VR

I for one don't care about the lens Geoff. As long as you can make the pictures you want to make. This one looks excellent from an optics point of view.
User avatar
surenj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7197
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Artarmon NSW


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques