Stonemason

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Stonemason

Postby Chaase on Fri Jan 01, 2010 12:03 pm

A close family friend is setting up a website for his Stonemason business and I offered to take some photos for him. I have not had many chances this year to take any non happy snaps this year hence minimal posts. I realise i have 5 pics because it was hard to narrow it down. Gary If it's an issue PM me and I will delete one.

All other photos are here http://www.accessaudits.com.au/DSLR/web/

They were all shot with my Tokina 12-24

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

Thanks for looking
Bruce
Last edited by Chaase on Thu Apr 14, 2011 10:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
Cheers, Bruce
Canon Eos 5D MKII, 16-35mm f2.8L II USM, EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM, EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM, EF 50mm f1.4 USM.
Edit photos OK.
http://bruceybaby66.smugmug.com/
User avatar
Chaase
Member
 
Posts: 261
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 1:31 pm
Location: Hallam, Victoria.

Re: Stonemason

Postby aim54x on Fri Jan 01, 2010 3:47 pm

Other than the great big hotspots in the first two images, I think you have done well to capture the stone work.
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42
Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black
Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
User avatar
aim54x
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7305
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
Location: Penshurst, Sydney

Re: Stonemason

Postby Chaase on Fri Jan 01, 2010 4:15 pm

aim54x wrote:Other than the great big hotspots in the first two images, I think you have done well to capture the stone work.


Thank You.

Between hotspots & heavy shadows it was a bit difficult. 35 degree day with no clouds - not ideal. I ended up using a flash on the second to counter some of the shadow. We only had a day to do it so what we got on site was what we had to work with.
Cheers, Bruce
Canon Eos 5D MKII, 16-35mm f2.8L II USM, EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM, EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM, EF 50mm f1.4 USM.
Edit photos OK.
http://bruceybaby66.smugmug.com/
User avatar
Chaase
Member
 
Posts: 261
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 1:31 pm
Location: Hallam, Victoria.

Re: Stonemason

Postby surenj on Fri Jan 01, 2010 4:27 pm

How about the night?

These are perfect for lightpainting. I think you can cut out distractions and do a great job highlighting the craftmanship.

I would lightpaint with a hardlight at an angle first and then try a softer source to see whether it could further improve things.
User avatar
surenj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7197
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Artarmon NSW

Re: Stonemason

Postby Chaase on Fri Jan 01, 2010 4:33 pm

surenj wrote:How about the night?


Nah, doing it as a favour and we did 12 locations in one day. That would equate to many nights away from the family. Plus I would ahve no idea how do produce a decent result.
Cheers, Bruce
Canon Eos 5D MKII, 16-35mm f2.8L II USM, EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM, EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM, EF 50mm f1.4 USM.
Edit photos OK.
http://bruceybaby66.smugmug.com/
User avatar
Chaase
Member
 
Posts: 261
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 1:31 pm
Location: Hallam, Victoria.

Re: Stonemason

Postby biggerry on Fri Jan 01, 2010 4:55 pm

I think given the day and conditions you have done well, it would be hard to get good images with that harsh sun!

Whilst you do not have the opportunity for other times in the day I reckon the 3rd and 4th images would look great at sunset with the house and yard lights on!

If you have the 1st and 2nd image in raw I reckon a puesdo HDR treatment might look quite good. If you post up a file i would happily have a crack..

Plus I would ahve no idea how do produce a decent result.


I think A tripod and fairly long shutter with the house / BBQ area lights on would do the trick...

At the end of the day you need to convey the stone work to the viewer and for someone looking for a potential tradesman to do this I think you need images concentrating more on the actual work than fancy effects - that said, fancy effects would not hurt :up:
gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
User avatar
biggerry
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5930
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney

Re: Stonemason

Postby Geoff M on Fri Jan 01, 2010 9:43 pm

Wonderful craftmanship in the stonework and you have done well with the photos too given the harsh lighting you have contended with. The white van in #2 has to go though!
Fuji X-Pro1 | X-E1 | X-T1 | XF14 | XF23 | XF27 | XF35 | XF56 | XF60 | XF10-24 | XF18-55 | XF55-200 | MCEX-11

http://gmarshall.zenfolio.com

http://xtographer.weebly.com
User avatar
Geoff M
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1225
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 10:54 pm
Location: Tamborine Mountain QLD.

Re: Stonemason

Postby Chaase on Fri Jan 01, 2010 10:35 pm

biggerry wrote:If you have the 1st and 2nd image in raw I reckon a puesdo HDR treatment might look quite good. If you post up a file i would happily have a crack.


Sure Its http://www.accessaudits.com.au/dslr/Stone.zip

Cheers
Bruce
Cheers, Bruce
Canon Eos 5D MKII, 16-35mm f2.8L II USM, EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM, EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM, EF 50mm f1.4 USM.
Edit photos OK.
http://bruceybaby66.smugmug.com/
User avatar
Chaase
Member
 
Posts: 261
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 1:31 pm
Location: Hallam, Victoria.

Re: Stonemason

Postby biggerry on Sun Jan 03, 2010 1:54 pm

alright, one o fthe images in the zip file was different to the original posted items, but hey, i had a bash at that anyway :)

Whilst this may not look substantially better I think it addresses the hotspots in the image and gives a more even light over the frame...anyway hth.

Image


and the other one...
Image


I must say too, it spun me out when I looked at the original posted images and they are named 'Gerry4', 'Gerry5' etc... :rotfl2:
gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
User avatar
biggerry
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5930
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney

Re: Stonemason

Postby Matt. K on Sun Jan 03, 2010 6:31 pm

Based on the images you posted I'd hire this guy to do my stone work. I guess that's the bottom line? :D
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Re: Stonemason

Postby Chaase on Mon Jan 04, 2010 12:20 pm

biggerry wrote:alright, one of the images in the zip file was different to the original posted items, but hey, i had a bash at that anyway :)

Whilst this may not look substantially better I think it addresses the hotspots in the image and gives a more even light over the frame...anyway hth.

I must say too, it spun me out when I looked at the original posted images and they are named 'Gerry4', 'Gerry5' etc... :rotfl2:


Gerry
Personally I think it makes a significant difference. Would you care to explain how you went about it for me please?

Thank You again
Bruce
Cheers, Bruce
Canon Eos 5D MKII, 16-35mm f2.8L II USM, EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM, EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM, EF 50mm f1.4 USM.
Edit photos OK.
http://bruceybaby66.smugmug.com/
User avatar
Chaase
Member
 
Posts: 261
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 1:31 pm
Location: Hallam, Victoria.

Re: Stonemason

Postby biggerry on Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:06 pm

Would you care to explain how you went about it for me please?


all I did was use Photomatix 3 and made a pseudo HDR from the single raw file, I basically just played with the strength and light smoothing sliders until i got a semi natural looking result. In the past I find you can get pretty close to the same effect adjusting the levels and curves on a raw file in Capture NX, this however does not help you since you use canon though.

here is a screen capture of the Photmatix options, click for larger

Image

I then adjusted contrast and alignment in Capture NX.

I hope this helps :up: questions comments queries... :cough:
gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
User avatar
biggerry
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5930
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney

Re: Stonemason

Postby Chaase on Tue Jan 12, 2010 2:43 pm

biggerry wrote:
I hope this helps :up: questions comments queries... :cough:


Thank you again for your assistance. This is an area I need to spend a bit more time on I can see. This has been a great start.

Thank you again.
Bruce
Cheers, Bruce
Canon Eos 5D MKII, 16-35mm f2.8L II USM, EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM, EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM, EF 50mm f1.4 USM.
Edit photos OK.
http://bruceybaby66.smugmug.com/
User avatar
Chaase
Member
 
Posts: 261
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 1:31 pm
Location: Hallam, Victoria.


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques