Family BBQModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Family BBQHere are a couple of pics I took on the weekend, first time using my new lens (50mm 1. so go easy!
f2.8, 1/320sec, iso400 f1.8, 1/13sec, iso400 using the overhead light in the car Normally wouldn't use that sort of shutter speed as it's nearly impossible to get a sharp image but was playing with the new lens and liked the lighting and mood it created f1.8, 1/60, iso400 This one's interesting lighting was due to natural light coming in through the front window, and a very yellow light behind. Apart from taking a different angle, is there a way to combat this? I've learned very quickly that this lens isn't sharp until about f2.8, but it's good to have the ability to go wider at a pinch... I will try and get some more up the next time I use it. Not much processing done on these, and what do you think about sharpness? eg the first especially, I think photobucket is sharpening them for me a bit? Josh
Re: Family BBQI've got the same lens and just adore it.. its sharp as a tack and sooooo much fun! I like your images btw the last one is a stand out for me with its great bokeh and good colours (well on my monitor anyway).. can I make a suggestion though.. in the first image of the older guy.. he needs more neck in the pic as it kinda looks like he's chopped off (an easy mistake to make and I know I've done it on more than one occassion lol).. and in the second I'm a little unsure on what the focus point is.. ideally her eye's should be focus but they look a little soft - although I really like the pose in this one!
The last thing I want to do is hurt you... but it's still on the list...
Re: Family BBQHaha the neck was chopped off, as I realised after the shot that there was a chair in the foreground which looks even worse! In regards to the second image, I believe the eyes are in focus, but as it was taken handheld at such a slow shutter speed and wide open, this is where the softness is coming from... I could be wrong though... The last is my favorite too, my girlfriend is a quirky type full of character and this picture shows some of that
Re: Family BBQHi Josh,
These are really good images, and you should be well satisfied with them. The first is nice and sharp, and the second has a great softness to it, which suits both the way it's been shot, as well as the subject. And I'm not at all troubled by the deep shadow on the lh side of your lady's face; this seems to suit the subject and image quite nicely. In the third, you refer to the issue with the two different types (and colours) of light. That's a tough one; you could kill the internal light, or perhaps draw some curtains on the window. What I would have probably done though is considered which of the light sources was the more powerful, and balanced my image towards that. As it stands, I think your image has been balanced towards the interior light source, and consequently the primary source - daylight - appears to be a little off colour in terms of its wb. Had you gone the other way, this would have added more warmth into the colouration. If you shot this in raw, have a play with your wb settings, and see what you can do with it.
What you may be seeing is not so much just that the lens sharpens up as you stop down - which it certainly does - but also you might need to bear in mind that a large aperture settings you have a very narrow range of DoF. If your focus is even marginally off, this will be very evident in your images. As you stop the lens down, your DoF range increases, and focus errors become less of an issue, but wide open they can be very obvious. From what we're seeing here, this lens is very sharp at f/2.8, but I encourage you to play with it and see where it's best: find the lens's sweet spot, so that you can take advantage of it. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Re: Family BBQ
Several ways; I assume you had manually set the WB to daylight. 1. Switch it off and use a reflector or off camera flash (which is daylight balanced) 2. Gel the tungsten light with lots of CTB gel to convert it to daylight 3. Use a gradient in photoshop to correct the colour 4. extreme method would be use a large CTO gel on the window to balance to tungsten and use tungten WB on camera. Hope to see more of your work.
Previous topic • Next topic
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|