Water Lilly Number 2Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
19 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Water Lilly Number 2Hi all,
Second Water Lilly...enjoy! (Aren't these flowers just stunning?!) ChaPPy
Not that photo I LIKE!
The blue is just about flourescent! New page
http://www.potofgrass.com Portfolio... http://images.potofgrass.com Comments and money always welcome
Dayam.. PlatinumWeaver / Dean
Asking the Stupid Questions <a href="http://www.platinumweaver.net/" alt="PlatinumWeaver Homepage">http://www.platinumweaver.net/</a>
Just gorgeous. Another beautiful image.
Taken with the kit lens again like the previous one, I'm assuming? This goes to show that we should probably lust a little less after bigger and better lenses and accessories and instead just be better photographers and do more with the tools already in our camera bags.
Stunning ChaPPy - if taken with the kit lens, then this pic has to be the best I have ever seen from this lens
Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
Ok, hope you don't mind but just thought I'd show you what it looks like with the flower selected and removed to a black background. Was fairly rushed < 5min so the stem is a bit incorrect
<img src="http://www.morganpost.com/waterlilly-2.jpg"> Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
Kipper, you right - looks better with black background...I'll be doing that before I print it.
It's just shot with the kit lens and as SoCal Steve says, rather spend time with your current kit and learn how to use it. I would love a proper macro lens and that's prob. the next thing I'll buy. I used to have a Sony DSC S75 and a polarizing filter and that was it. Used that for 3 years. Now I've upgraded to this stunning Nikon Camera and enjoy every shot with it. Sorry guys, didn't get to the Melboure meetings yet. This was taken just outside Melbourne at a place called Blue Lotus Waterlily & Lotus Farm. This is 25 minutes from Lilydale on the Warburton H'way (Melways 288 H8). (Any more exact and I'll have to drive you there! ) I've got a few more shots to come is this "series".. EXIF: Original date/time: 2005:02:27 15:48:54 Exposure time: 1/640 F-stop: 4.5 Focal length: 70.0000 Flash: Not fired Orientation: Left-bottom Light source: Unknown Exposure bias: 0.0000 Metering mode: Pattern Exposure program: Aperture priority Digitized date/time: 2005:02:27 15:48:54 Modified date/time: 2005:02:27 15:48:54 Scene type: Photograph User comment: Compression: 6 Camera make: NIKON CORPORATION Camera model: NIKON D70 X resolution: 300.0000 Y resolution: 300.0000 Resolution unit: Inches Camera version: Ver.1.02 Colorspace: Uncalibrated File source: DSC
Previous topic • Next topic
19 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|