Nikon D3s vs Canon 1D Mark IV

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Nikon D3s vs Canon 1D Mark IV

Postby radar on Mon Jan 25, 2010 9:05 am

A good comparison between two great systems, specifically for sports photography. It isn't really a "my system is better then yours" which is good to read.

http://uniquephoto.blogspot.com/2010/01 ... david.html

cheers,

André
Photography, as a powerful medium of expression and communications, offers an infinite variety of perception, interpretation and execution. Ansel Adams

(misc Nikon stuff)
User avatar
radar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2823
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 11:18 am
Location: Lake Macquarie (Newcastle) - D700, D7000

Re: Nikon D3s vs Canon 1D Mark IV

Postby gstark on Mon Jan 25, 2010 9:27 am

André,

Thanks. That's a great article, well written and neutral, and accompanied by some raw files that permit you to judge, for yourself, the files produced by either camera.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Re: Nikon D3s vs Canon 1D Mark IV

Postby Reschsmooth on Mon Jan 25, 2010 9:36 am

Great article, one presumably produced in the same style as Fox News - Fair & Balanced! :D

One thing that came to mind reading this, when considering the crop versus full-frame debate for very long telephoto users is this: a cropped camera can, ceteris paribus, save you big dollars. Comparing the Nikon 400 2.8 to the 300 2.8 [both IF ED VR], a camer with AP-C style sensor can allow the photographer to use, say, the 300 and achieve a perceived similar (in fact longer) reach than the full-frame with the 400, and, in doing so, save $4,500!

Obviously, there are other issues, such as DOF and the like, to consider, but interesting nevertheless.
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Re: Nikon D3s vs Canon 1D Mark IV

Postby radar on Mon Jan 25, 2010 9:47 am

Patrick,

Reschsmooth wrote:the 300 and achieve a perceived similar (in fact longer) reach than the full-frame with the 400, and, in doing so, save $4,500!


I did notice that price difference. Not to be picky, but the reach is actually very close as the Canon as a 1.3 crop sensor, so that give you 390mm :wink:
Photography, as a powerful medium of expression and communications, offers an infinite variety of perception, interpretation and execution. Ansel Adams

(misc Nikon stuff)
User avatar
radar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2823
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 11:18 am
Location: Lake Macquarie (Newcastle) - D700, D7000

Re: Nikon D3s vs Canon 1D Mark IV

Postby Reschsmooth on Mon Jan 25, 2010 9:50 am

radar wrote:Patrick,

Reschsmooth wrote:the 300 and achieve a perceived similar (in fact longer) reach than the full-frame with the 400, and, in doing so, save $4,500!


I did notice that price difference. Not to be picky, but the reach is actually very close as the Canon as a 1.3 crop sensor, so that give you 390mm :wink:


Ah, yes, but I was imperceptably referring to shooting only with Nikon where the choices are full-frame or 1.5x crop. The price difference between the Canon & Nikon lens prices referred to in the article are what piqued my interest.
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Re: Nikon D3s vs Canon 1D Mark IV

Postby dviv on Mon Jan 25, 2010 9:58 am

Great article - thanks for posting.

As the others have said - it's nice to read a balanced article for a change :mrgreen:

Nikon are really kicking butt in the high ISO stakes with that D3 sensor. It will be interesting to see the next iterations of these cameras so see if Canon improve the noise, and Nikon improve the AF.

It would be good if both could improve the price.... :chook: :mrgreen:

All good for the consumer in the end :up:
7D, 60D, 70-200mm f/4LIS, 17-50mm f/2.8, 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5, 50mm f/1.4, 100mm f/2.8 Macro, 580EX II
User avatar
dviv
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1085
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 8:50 am
Location: North Shore, Sydney


Return to General Discussion