The Creek

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

The Creek

Postby J.Davis on Tue Jan 26, 2010 3:36 pm

Went out to Tallabudgera Creek on Sunday - Very hot and, after this was taken, very crowded.
This is my first real go at HDR, I think it worked.
Image
Regards
John
Nikon D7000,Sigma 10-20, Sigma 24-70 F2.8, Sigma 70-200 f2.8, Nikkor 50 F1.8, Nikkor 85 1.8.
Benro A650, SB600.
User avatar
J.Davis
Member
 
Posts: 120
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 12:12 am
Location: Willowbank Qld

Re: The Creek

Postby Wink on Tue Jan 26, 2010 4:19 pm

I think it's worked too.
Would a CPL filter have been handy for cutting the reflection on the water?
Adam.
MY PHOTOS
Allows Image Editing
User avatar
Wink
Senior Member
 
Posts: 911
Joined: Sat Aug 15, 2009 4:23 pm
Location: Seymour, VIC

Re: The Creek

Postby Killakoala on Tue Jan 26, 2010 9:03 pm

'Tis an excellent HDR. Just the way they should be done. (Not overdone like some.)
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Re: The Creek

Postby Big V on Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:41 pm

I agree with you it has worked!
Canon
User avatar
Big V
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2301
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 1:37 am
Location: Adelaide

Re: The Creek

Postby Aussie Dave on Wed Jan 27, 2010 12:55 am

J.Davis wrote:Went out to Tallabudgera Creek on Sunday - Very hot and, after this was taken, very crowded.
This is my first real go at HDR, I think it worked.


Hi John,
I really like the photo and it is a nicely done HDR. However, IMO, the brightness of the reflection in the water kept drawing my eye back to it (and due to the refraction of the water, it looks out of focus - even though it isn't).

I took the liberty of doing a quick Capture NX2-edit job (using a few colour control-points and Auto retouch tool), to tone down the reflection and some of the brighter areas - see lower image.
If you would like me to remove the edited version, please let me know and I will do so.

Image
Image

Just another option on what is possible...

Cheers,
Dave
Last edited by Aussie Dave on Wed Jan 27, 2010 10:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
Dave
Nikon D7000 | 18-105 VR Lens | Nikon 50 1.8G | Sigma 70-300 APO II Super Macro | Tokina 11-16 AT-X | Nikon SB-800 | Lowepro Mini Trekker AWII
Photography = Compromise
User avatar
Aussie Dave
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1427
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: West. Suburbs, Melbourne [Nikon D7000]

Re: The Creek

Postby biggerry on Wed Jan 27, 2010 8:48 am

Thats a nice shot of a tranquil scene - I would be interested in seeing the original centre bracketed .nef image, how much dynamic range was there in the scene?
gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
User avatar
biggerry
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5930
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney

Re: The Creek

Postby J.Davis on Wed Jan 27, 2010 12:28 pm

This is 3 of 5, Photomatix has done wonders.
Image
Regards
John
Nikon D7000,Sigma 10-20, Sigma 24-70 F2.8, Sigma 70-200 f2.8, Nikkor 50 F1.8, Nikkor 85 1.8.
Benro A650, SB600.
User avatar
J.Davis
Member
 
Posts: 120
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 12:12 am
Location: Willowbank Qld

Re: The Creek

Postby aim54x on Wed Jan 27, 2010 8:13 pm

Looks great, and I agree with Steve, it is not overcooked like so many HDRs

I do like the version that has a toned down reflection.

Greats stuff
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42
Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black
Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
User avatar
aim54x
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7305
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
Location: Penshurst, Sydney

Re: The Creek

Postby johnmc on Wed Jan 27, 2010 9:35 pm

Nice work John (great name too!)

I'm curious to know which of the various HDR techniques you happened to use? the "automagic" photoshop with some tweaking, a more manual approach in photoshop, or something else all together?
Canon EOS50D, 17-40mm f4 L USM, 24-105mm f4 L IS USM, 50mm f1.4 USM, 28-80mm f3.5-5.6, 70-300mm f4-5.6 & various other bits ;)
my flickr photostream
User avatar
johnmc
Member
 
Posts: 64
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 11:45 pm
Location: Narre Warren South

Re: The Creek

Postby zafra52 on Wed Jan 27, 2010 9:48 pm

My problem is that the water is not
credible. Some, on the left, is static;
while some in the right is blurred,
hence moving. What is it?
Last edited by zafra52 on Thu Jan 28, 2010 7:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
zafra52
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4827
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:22 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: The Creek

Postby J.Davis on Thu Jan 28, 2010 12:51 pm

John - the program I used is photomatix, and PP in CS3.
Zafra - the water that is blurred is only the reflections of the brightly lit folage in the background, it was moving, not the water.
Regards
John
Nikon D7000,Sigma 10-20, Sigma 24-70 F2.8, Sigma 70-200 f2.8, Nikkor 50 F1.8, Nikkor 85 1.8.
Benro A650, SB600.
User avatar
J.Davis
Member
 
Posts: 120
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 12:12 am
Location: Willowbank Qld

Re: The Creek

Postby zafra52 on Thu Jan 28, 2010 7:41 pm

Thanks John. I can see it now.
I've had that program now
for six months, but never had
the occasion to use it.
User avatar
zafra52
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4827
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:22 pm
Location: Brisbane


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques