The CreekModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
The CreekWent out to Tallabudgera Creek on Sunday - Very hot and, after this was taken, very crowded.
This is my first real go at HDR, I think it worked. Regards
John Nikon D7000,Sigma 10-20, Sigma 24-70 F2.8, Sigma 70-200 f2.8, Nikkor 50 F1.8, Nikkor 85 1.8. Benro A650, SB600.
Re: The CreekI think it's worked too.
Would a CPL filter have been handy for cutting the reflection on the water?
Re: The Creek'Tis an excellent HDR. Just the way they should be done. (Not overdone like some.)
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
Re: The Creek
Hi John, I really like the photo and it is a nicely done HDR. However, IMO, the brightness of the reflection in the water kept drawing my eye back to it (and due to the refraction of the water, it looks out of focus - even though it isn't). I took the liberty of doing a quick Capture NX2-edit job (using a few colour control-points and Auto retouch tool), to tone down the reflection and some of the brighter areas - see lower image. If you would like me to remove the edited version, please let me know and I will do so. Just another option on what is possible... Cheers, Dave Last edited by Aussie Dave on Wed Jan 27, 2010 10:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
Dave
Nikon D7000 | 18-105 VR Lens | Nikon 50 1.8G | Sigma 70-300 APO II Super Macro | Tokina 11-16 AT-X | Nikon SB-800 | Lowepro Mini Trekker AWII Photography = Compromise
Re: The CreekThats a nice shot of a tranquil scene - I would be interested in seeing the original centre bracketed .nef image, how much dynamic range was there in the scene?
gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: The CreekThis is 3 of 5, Photomatix has done wonders.
Regards
John Nikon D7000,Sigma 10-20, Sigma 24-70 F2.8, Sigma 70-200 f2.8, Nikkor 50 F1.8, Nikkor 85 1.8. Benro A650, SB600.
Re: The CreekLooks great, and I agree with Steve, it is not overcooked like so many HDRs
I do like the version that has a toned down reflection. Greats stuff Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Re: The CreekNice work John (great name too!)
I'm curious to know which of the various HDR techniques you happened to use? the "automagic" photoshop with some tweaking, a more manual approach in photoshop, or something else all together? Canon EOS50D, 17-40mm f4 L USM, 24-105mm f4 L IS USM, 50mm f1.4 USM, 28-80mm f3.5-5.6, 70-300mm f4-5.6 & various other bits
my flickr photostream
Re: The CreekMy problem is that the water is not
credible. Some, on the left, is static; while some in the right is blurred, hence moving. What is it? Last edited by zafra52 on Thu Jan 28, 2010 7:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: The CreekJohn - the program I used is photomatix, and PP in CS3.
Zafra - the water that is blurred is only the reflections of the brightly lit folage in the background, it was moving, not the water. Regards
John Nikon D7000,Sigma 10-20, Sigma 24-70 F2.8, Sigma 70-200 f2.8, Nikkor 50 F1.8, Nikkor 85 1.8. Benro A650, SB600.
Re: The CreekThanks John. I can see it now.
I've had that program now for six months, but never had the occasion to use it.
Previous topic • Next topic
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|