Sitting in the Park

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Sitting in the Park

Postby aim54x on Fri Jan 29, 2010 11:56 pm

I snapped this with my D60 and Sigma 180mm f/3.5 macro yesterday whilst waiting for my friend in the park before heading off to see the Wildlife Photographer of the Year exhibition.

Image
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42
Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black
Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
User avatar
aim54x
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7305
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
Location: Penshurst, Sydney

Re: Sitting in the Park

Postby the foto fanatic on Sat Jan 30, 2010 2:41 pm

There are a couple of things to like about this image.

Firstly, the camera position is low, providing an interesting angle of view.
Secondly, there is some rim lighting on the subject, and that gives her some definition.
Thirdly, the background directly behind her is a nice contrast.

However, the large post on the left of the image detracts from all of this because it is bright and it is not totally OOF. Would you consider cropping the photo at the right edge of that post with the bottom along the border of the garden below her feet?

Like this:
Image

I reckon that might make for a better image - you'd lose the distraction and some of the dead foreground, but still should have a nice line leading to the subject.

Nice candid shot, anyway.
TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present
My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic
Nikon stuff!
User avatar
the foto fanatic
Moderator
 
Posts: 4212
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 7:53 pm
Location: Teneriffe, Brisbane

Re: Sitting in the Park

Postby Killakoala on Sat Jan 30, 2010 3:48 pm

While I mostly agree with our resident FotoFanatic I do think the large pole balances out what would otherwise be a whop-sided rule-of-thirds image. The pole makes it more rule-of-two-thirds, which I think is more appealing. The pole is sufficiently out of focus to draw attention to the girl and not to itself. Besides, the human element is always more interesting than a boring pole in an image which contains both and my eye is drawn to her, rather than the pole. Maybe that's because I am more drawn to the female form rather than phallic symbolism. :D

Besides all that, I think it's an excellent documentary.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Re: Sitting in the Park

Postby biggerry on Sat Jan 30, 2010 5:47 pm

following on from fotofanatic and killakoala, how about a pano crop, the only thing I find draws my eye away is the OOF area in the foreground..maybe removing that and some from the top might be another option.

If ya had taken that 15 years ago, (besides the fact you were but a wee tacker) it would have been a young girl with a book instead...how times have changed, noone reads books in parks anymore... :|

I am more drawn to the female form rather than phallic symbolism.

well, thats lucky eh.. i was getting worried about you there steve. :wink:
gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
User avatar
biggerry
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5930
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney

Re: Sitting in the Park

Postby gstark on Sat Jan 30, 2010 6:15 pm

I like it just as it is.

A very simple image, simply well done.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Re: Sitting in the Park

Postby Big V on Sat Jan 30, 2010 9:45 pm

I vote for leaving it as is - the pole etc adds context to the setting and makes it a far more interesting image - why is she using a lappy there?
Canon
User avatar
Big V
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2301
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 1:37 am
Location: Adelaide

Re: Sitting in the Park

Postby norwest on Sat Jan 30, 2010 10:44 pm

I like everything about it. Great catch. I believe the foreground and the pole give it nice depth that would be lost if cropped.
norwest
Member
 
Posts: 265
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 3:12 pm
Location: Namoi Valley North West NSW

Re: Sitting in the Park

Postby aim54x on Sat Jan 30, 2010 10:59 pm

thanks for all the comments!!!

Trevor - I had a look at the original suggestion for a crop whilst at work, and did not like losing the feet, however this 2nd crop has nice potential...but leaves the image a bit empty in some ways. Totally agree about the distracting nature of that post though, now that you point it out it does compete a bit, damn luminance!

Gerry - Pano crop....I'll have a play with it. I was actually considering a slightly different crop...3:2 but losing most of the LHS up until the LHS of the post then trimming top and bottom...not sure...but i will have a play.
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42
Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black
Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
User avatar
aim54x
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7305
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
Location: Penshurst, Sydney


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques