Aperture 3 - sooooo sexy!!!Moderator: Moderators
Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Aperture 3 - sooooo sexy!!!Apple's Aperture 3 is out and with all the new features introduced, for me the upgrade price of $119 is a no brainer:
http://www.apple.com/aperture/whats-new.html I was thinking about paying US$40 for Maperture Pro to geotag - it's now all in Aperture so that is a saving in itself. I'm off the the Apple store now............. Canon 7D | Canon 350D | G5 | S95 | 24-70mm f2.8L | 50mm f1.8 II | 70-200mm f2.8L USM | 430EX II | Strobist gear
Re: Aperture 3 - sooooo sexy!!!I'm glad they now support audio attachments to images, and will use the audio tagging on my camera a lot more as a result. Also looking forward to the CA reduction feature, which I used to love back when I was using Bibble Pro. If it works as well as Bibble's I might hold off on purchasing NX2 for a while.
Good upgrade pricing, too. Cheers Steffen. lust for comfort suffocates the soul
Re: Aperture 3 - sooooo sexy!!!Whats Aperture like. i've been told it's not as good as photoshop, the price suits me better than photoshop.
D200 etc
Re: Aperture 3 - sooooo sexy!!!Very interesting. At that price it's got to be worth a try.
Nikon 14-24 / 24-70 / 80-200 AFS / 50mm1.4 / 10.5 / 60mm Macro
http://www.lensaloft.com.au
Re: Aperture 3 - sooooo sexy!!!Digitalrev's review is full of praise for Aperture 3
http://blog.digitalrev.com/2010/02/10/a ... hers-ever/
Re: Aperture 3 - sooooo sexy!!!Thanks for review link, Natskis, I'm pondering Ps vs. Aperture at the moment and need to come to a decision.
Have: Nikon D90.. Nikkor AF-S 18-200mm VRII, Nikkor AF-S 50mm f/1.4G, Nikkor 10.5mm f/2.8 Fisheye, Tokina AT-X 116 11-16mm f/2.8, Tokina AT-X M100 100mm f/2.8 Macro.. Manfrotto 732CY & 484RC2, SB-600, Think Tank gear..
Next: Nikkor AF 35mm f/1.8G, Sigma EM-140 DG Ring Flash..
Re: Aperture 3 - sooooo sexy!!!
They are really two quite different products. APerture is more akin to Lightroom than Photoshop. A is strong on photo organisation, but relatively weak (but by no means useless!) at tweaking an individual photo PS is great at tweaking, but weak -useless actually - on organisation. That's why they make you buy LR as well. If you have neither, I would suggest Aperture, then if you find you want to tweak more than it allows, then consider PS as well. Greg
It's easy to be good... when there is nothing else to do
Re: Aperture 3 - sooooo sexy!!!I think that Photoshop is meant to be used in conjunction with Adobe Bridge (which is designed as an organising tool), and has a direct link from PS (and other apps in the CS range) to Bridge (and vice versa)....though Lightroom is the better "one-tool" option for photographers (but isn't as advanced in it's editing capabilities as Photoshop).
Dave
Nikon D7000 | 18-105 VR Lens | Nikon 50 1.8G | Sigma 70-300 APO II Super Macro | Tokina 11-16 AT-X | Nikon SB-800 | Lowepro Mini Trekker AWII Photography = Compromise
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|