Roses by rohseyModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Roses by rohseyI was browsing on flickr today and saw what I thought, a very interesting picture of a couple of tulips captured by PICA.
I liked the image that much that I had to try and recreate this one for myself. It did take me a while to set it up and to capture it but I have to admit that it is nowhere near as good as the one from PICA. Anyway here is my result would love to know what you think and maybe you have got some ideas on how to make this one better. Gruss Craig "Old school" (Olympus OM 1&2SP )
Re: Roses by rohseyCould we see the shot that inspired you. Perhaps post a link.
I personally would like to see more light from the left. It doesn't need much, just enough to define the flower's form. Perhaps a dull reflector. Greg
It's easy to be good... when there is nothing else to do
Re: Roses by rohseyHere we go hope this works:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mariastromvik/4506823267/ I feel the same with the lighting just could not get it right, will have to try a little more on this one! "Old school" (Olympus OM 1&2SP )
Re: Roses by rohseyCould I suggest softer light especially since your roses have a complex contour. Perhaps a gridded (single diffused) softbox would be better.
The hardish light suits the tulips because their comtour isn't as complex. Just a thought. Nice replication of his method BTW.
Re: Roses by rohsey
maybe also just a fraction more contrast. good idea Craig...would liek to see a version with another light as Greg mentioned gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Previous topic • Next topic
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|