Rolling Around On A Bed - NSFW

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Rolling Around On A Bed - NSFW

Postby fhphoto on Thu Apr 15, 2010 7:33 am

I thought the polaroid post processing is quite fitting to the scene.

Lighting done in ETTL.

1.
Image
2.
Image
User avatar
fhphoto
Newbie
 
Posts: 20
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: Brisbane, QLD, Australia

Re: Rolling Around On A Bed - NSFW

Postby gstark on Thu Apr 15, 2010 10:11 am

fhphoto wrote:I thought the polaroid post processing is quite fitting to the scene.


While I like the concept in the post processing, unless you're really looking to go for a very blown, over-exposed style of image, These just don't do it for me.

I don't mind the harsh shadows, nor the poses - together these are providing a startled rabbit kind of effect, and that's good. but I think that you may still want to pull the intensity of the lighting down by at least a stop, and probably more. There's a ton of detail here waiting to come out, but with the image as over-exposed as it is, those details are toast.

Use the Polaroid concept to work with modifying the colours and feel of the image, but for best effect, you still need to have a correctly exposed, workable image as a starting point.

<housekeeping>Please take a moment to review our posting rules, both in the FAQ, as well as at the top of this page. Images posted should not be any larger than 800px along the longest side; these are somewhat bigger. Also, you should look at your post processing techniques and reduce the file sizes of the images that you're posting. These are 400K plus. Or at least one of them is. There are several issues here - not everyone has broadband, and bigger file sizes make it more difficult for those to dl and view them. Probably of greater importance though is your intellectual property present in images that you post. The larger the filesize, the greater the available quality in the image that you post. If somebody wishes to steal your images, you are making it very easy for them. This is not considered to be a good idea.</housekeeping>
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Re: Rolling Around On A Bed - NSFW

Postby Killakoala on Sun Apr 18, 2010 11:17 pm

This technique of converting otherwise good images into 1970s polaroids is annoying to me. We have great cameras today that are capable of producing brilliant high dynamic range images, so why spoil them by making them look like mass produced poor quality junk.

HOWEVER, unlike Gary, I like the poses in both images. Although the first one looks like a honeymoon photo, I think the polaroid effect has reduced the image in quality and focus.

That, of course, is just my opinion.

Polariods, Flared pants and leg-warmers should remain in the 70s where they belong.

I have enjoyed the images you have shown lately though. I hope to see more. :)
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Re: Rolling Around On A Bed - NSFW

Postby BullcreekBob on Tue Apr 20, 2010 12:52 pm

Killakoala wrote:...Although the first one looks like a honeymoon photo,


Hmmm, I hope my *next* honeymoon looks that :)

I think the poses are good and I especially like the expression in the eyes in #2. I too would like to see the lighting toned down a stop or two or three or four. I think these would work better where details were lost to the shadows rather than to light.
Cheers

Bob in sunny Perth
What gear? Watch this space!
User avatar
BullcreekBob
Member
 
Posts: 444
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 1:57 pm
Location: Manning - an inner southern suburb of Perth, WA


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques