Pinup In The WoodsModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Re: Pinup In The Woods
Strobe in the shot? Or strobe in this shot? They're two very different questions. When it works, and it quite often can, then why not? But in this shot, it does nothing for me, I don't know that it's adding anything here, except perhaps a distraction. Also, you seem to have a light source off to camera left, but I think it's a bit too strong for this image; you have blown, or are very close to blowing, a lot of details on the model's rh side (left side of the image as we are viewing it). Look at he shoulder, belly, and in particular, the nape of her neck. I think that pulling back the power of that light source may have helped you somewhat. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Re: Pinup In The WoodsTo address your question first, in general the strobe being in the shot can be used to effect and I've seen it work quite well on occasion. Here I tent to agree with Gary. not sure it's really giving you much here. For the strobe in frame to work, it needs to either add so some sort of story, or be explained by context. eg it might be representing the sun here if it was higher, or if she was looking over her shoulder with a look of trepidation perhaps it could represent the lights of a pursuer.
To the wider image, I tend to agree the light camera left could have been brought back about a half stop, though I'd say it's a preference thing and if you wanted it that close to blown, then ignore us! I would say however that framing this slightly differently would have helped. I think moving yourself slightly to your right, resulting in the model moving left against the background, to hide that piece of blown sky that is intersecting with her neck camera left. I think that this blown area blends into the hot neck and that removing that would give some better separation. With that change, I think the hot lighting from camera left would work better as well. Cheers.
Re: Pinup In The WoodsCameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Re: Pinup In The Woods Unfortunately I also feel distracted by the extra strobe.
Re: Pinup In The WoodsIn this particular shot, I feel the strobe has no context, as has been mentioned. The placement does not fit with any perceived logic or story.
Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Re: Pinup In The WoodsI beg to differ.
I think that the strobe looks slightly in front of your model. Some kind of depth perception thingy. If your model could cast her eyes in the direction of the strobe-light and hold her hands out as if she were holding or perhaps trying to touch the 'light,' then the image would have worked really well. So I think you should think about this again and use the strobe as the focus of the image. Use the model as a prop. If you see what I mean. Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|