Did the experiment work?Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Did the experiment work?I have been wanting to try this for some time and tonight Marvin (Lee) and I had the time to give it a go. Does it work for you?
and an example of the original Canon
Re: Did the experiment work?You must read the same blogs as me, this is something I've been looking to try as well!
Looking at the original, it seems you've got the technique pretty much sorted. All you can really control is framing and exposure and I think you have them quite nice. I like what you have done with the processing for the final images as well. It's a very different look and takes it to an abstract level. The blue plumes give a feel of an ink drop slowly dissolving into water, quite different from the original subject. Nice work!
Re: Did the experiment work?they look cool
i prefer the inverted look because it doent look obvious but what is it looks to me like a lightbulb without the housing Wendell Levi Teodoro
My Agents Press - Getty Images Creative Rep - T.I.D. FashionID, DBP Productions & The Nest Agency My Book - Zeduce
Re: Did the experiment work?wow, love it, i love the second of them. Interesting, might give it a go one day myself.....ok maybe not, but it looks like it was some good fun!!
2 x Fuji xt1,vg-xt1 grip, Fujinon xf 18-55mm 2.8-4, Fujinon xf 14mm, Fujinon 56mm 1.2.
Re: Did the experiment work?Wendell it is a light bulb with the glass removed so that when you switch it on the filament blows and you get the rising smoke, this all happens very quickly - less than a second. If you want to try this you will need to hurry as these type of bulbs are harder to find as we switch over to the newer types.
Canon
Re: Did the experiment work?Very cool Tony.
Does your lens warranty cover exploding light bulbs?
Re: Did the experiment work?Yes these work for me. Great stuff
Regards Colin
Cameras, lenses and a lust for life
Re: Did the experiment work?Ahhh~!!
Teach me oh great one! Is that really all it was? just a bulb with the housing removed? hrm... i might go to bunnings and invest in a couple of hundred =D Canon | Sony | Panasonic | Tamron | Sigma
My photography is still developing. Don't be so negative! http://www.photomarcs.com
Re: Did the experiment work?Yes thats all there is to it. Place the bulb in a plastic bag when you break the glass and you will not have any mess to clean up!!
Canon
Re: Did the experiment work?Very nice photo
I actually prefer the original over the inverted image. The photo was very well exposed and just perfect for me
Previous topic • Next topic
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|