Defying gravityModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
18 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Defying gravityHad a chance to do some break dance portraits recently.
I had seen this sports pavilion and had an idea for a couple of years. Finally it's great to be able to at least attempt what you had in mind. I would be grateful for your critique. Frozen About to be freeze...
Re: Defying gravityI like the feel of these Surenj. Very gritty and dark.
Well above the average. Regards Colin
Cameras, lenses and a lust for life
Re: Defying gravityLoving the vibe of these, I am sure they will be happy with the results - great effort and result.
Canon
Re: Defying gravitydamn good Suren , you are definitely a strobist at heart eh..one flash to the left?
great choice for the POV, the low down POV works very well for this kind of shot, the backdrop is very fitting also, those two lights work well, I would however consider just cropping teh image to make them symmetrical about those lights, but that could just be me be pendantic..That bit of sky also works very well, satisfies that pesky thirds rule too.. gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: Defying gravity
Thanks Colin. I know I am definitely above average. Just like 99% of the population.
Thanks BigV, he is pretty happy with these. It's interesting, while I am interested in the composition, color, lights, shadows etc, he is most interested in the 'correct' pose, difficulty of the trick etc. It's taught me a good lesson in listening and tuning in to the mindset of the person you are photographing.
Definitely. Although I have stopped lugging my flash to photograph sunsets etc.... This is just the same softbox as yours. Single diffused and at a distance so slightly harsher. Although it would have been nice to have another light or two for accents, I don't have any other flashes or triggers.
Thanks for this. I am terrible with symmetry, levelling and cropping. I waste alot of pixels because of horizon issues. I will have another go.
I waited until dusk so that my little flash would be powerful enough to be par with the sky... One of the problems of the ebay triggers is that they pull down your sync speed. [although not by much but still]
Re: Defying gravitynice feel to the first one Surenj! =D
Great shots Surenj, 10-22 canon win for sure! I would have personally made it a little bit colder.. with a hint of sepia toning.. but thats just me. WELL DONE !!!!! Canon | Sony | Panasonic | Tamron | Sigma
My photography is still developing. Don't be so negative! http://www.photomarcs.com
Re: Defying gravity
Thanks for this suggestion. Will look into it. I wouldn't have colorised at all, but I made a mistake with the color balancing. I used a tungsten filter on the flash which made the sky go electric blue; which didn't suit this mood... Grr..
I thought you didn't like this lens? I have noticed little problems with corner sharpness but then I don't use the corners too much at 10mm
Re: Defying gravity
yeah true, but where would you have placed them, out of interest?
exactly, what does the person want from the picture? typically they are not interested in the effect but more on teh subject/content, whether it be a dance position, part of a product shoot etc...I think you have learnt a valuable lesson here Suren. gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: Defying gravity
1 more flash: likely camera right, back of the subject, +1EV, snooted, out of the frame = highlight him from the right 2 more = probably similar affair from the left OR try and do something creative in the background with coloured gels or something in the stadium OR just use it to fill the very dark shadows slightly although this may change the mood too much.
Re: Defying gravityHey Surenj! which sports pavilion is this at?
also, I don't prefer the 10-22mm.. I'd rather the 10-24 tamron... but it sure is a win for you here Canon | Sony | Panasonic | Tamron | Sigma
My photography is still developing. Don't be so negative! http://www.photomarcs.com
Re: Defying gravity
Marc, this is in Melbourne. IF you really need it, I can look up google maps for you.
Re: Defying gravitySome great images here. While I really enjoy my 5D, the one thing I do miss with FF is the 10-22 lens. It was simply outstanding. Oh well, you can't have everything.
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
Re: Defying gravity
Have you used the 16-35 ? It would have been nice to have 2.8 on the 10-22 but then you CAN'T have everything! The Tamron doesn't quite have the range I was keen for. 22 is very very useful when you are out and about doing landscapes.
Re: Defying gravity
Nope, t'would be nice but I'm very happy with my current lineup of lens. 24mm on FF is still quite wide, but not wonderfully wacky like the 10-22. President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
Re: Defying gravityLoving these pics - quality work
Nice low point of view. Were you on your stomach or knees? Either way it cant have been very comfortable for you. Only distracting issue i have seen is in image #2 - with the horizontal line running through his head. Its something that I do myself from time to time with horrizon lines so im a bit picky when it comes to that kind of thing. Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/ My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
Re: Defying gravityi really like the spatial feel between the enironment and subject you have achieved great lines and have finished off the photos with a great tonal style
well done Wendell Levi Teodoro
My Agents Press - Getty Images Creative Rep - T.I.D. FashionID, DBP Productions & The Nest Agency My Book - Zeduce
Re: Defying gravity
I was actually standing. There was a ledge and the stadium is elevated on it! Still my chin was on the ground while taking these. I was wishing for live view then!
Thanks for pointing this out! I couldn't see the said line until I stared at it for 5 minutes!!
Thanks Wendell.
Re: Defying gravitySuren
That first image is bizarre! And therein is its appeal. I can picture product advertisements built around that image and perhaps for that reason it might even be a very saleable image...."Put your ear to the ground...Ipod" kinda stuff. Technically it's a very interesting image and you snagged it perfectly. Regards
Matt. K
Previous topic • Next topic
18 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|