Golden tailed geckoModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Re: Golden tailed geckoHi Bob,
My only comment on both these (two Gecko photos) is that I would prefer a greater DOF. Also They are both distinguished, in their name at least, by their tails, but we can't see them. I would be happier if this one was a golden eyed gecko I do like the way you placed the light over the "devil" iris Greg
It's easy to be good... when there is nothing else to do
Re: Golden tailed geckoBob this is an outstanding photo. I actually like the shallow DOF. It is an absolute cracker. Well done. Ozi.
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
Re: Golden tailed gecko
x2. for me the dof is perfect. the stunning background makes the shot pop right out of the screen. EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
Re: Golden tailed geckoThis shot would look at home in Nat Geographic any day.
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
Re: Golden tailed geckoI think the use of DOF in this image really focuses the viewer on that amazing eye, which I am sure just blinked at me while I was looking at it. Tack sharp too. I just love the detail.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
Re: Golden tailed geckoI agree that the DOF is spot on, but then the fact that it is a golden tailed gecko and you can't see that leaves me wondering what the rest of it is. However it is still a great shot
Re: Golden tailed geckoNice details - it looks very sharp.
Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/ My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
Re: Golden tailed geckoNice! Very nice.
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|