Blue Mountains WalkModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Blue Mountains WalkYesterday four bearded fellows went for a walk around the gorgeous Blue Mountains. Stubbsy, Andrew, Greg and myself all enjoyed some great weather and great company and a great vantage point for sunset.
Here are 4 shots from my trip first two taken with the 90mm Tamron and the two two are 14-24mm. Keen to hear your feedback.
Re: Blue Mountains WalkMy preference is for #3. It has colour, desolation, cold
and atmosphere.The first one is an interesting depth of field study abstract. I feel you would have had a better result with the second if you had been closer; while the fourth lacks the colour intensity of the third.
Re: Blue Mountains Walk#3 all the way, maybe pano crop and straighten up the horizon. Crop only the bottom to go for the 3rds? or crop for symmetry? either would work with a pano!
now that would have been a great picture gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: Blue Mountains Walk
No group photos unfortunately. How is this for a pano crop ?
Re: Blue Mountains Walk
nioce... firstly, ignore my previous comment about horizon straightness..I first viewed that image on the laptop and it was alot darker, which now when viewing it on a desktop monitor, i prefer, I am not a fan of the detail in the shadows, for this particular image anyway, I think silhouetting would work better. here's what I mean, if you want it removed just let me know, thoughts? gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: Blue Mountains WalkCraig
As with the others #3 is the standout here for me (your version rather than Gerry's). What really impresses me with this shot is the brilliance of the composition to make the most of that water puddle. Bloody clever. Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Re: Blue Mountains WalkCraig, great stuff with #3, the pano crop works well, and colours could still be juiced a bit more (Gerry you have taken them a bit too far though).
The first two images leave me a bit confused as to what you were trying to achieve though. That 14-24 is brillant! Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Re: Blue Mountains WalkI'm with the others with #3. If Peter hadn't said it was a puddle, I would have assumed it was a small lake. Great use of what you had available. I also prefer the slightly more subdued colours in your version over Gerry's.
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|