Lighthouse ProcessingModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
13 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Lighthouse Processing4 images, four different era's of the same lighthouse...that was the aim.
So the first query is, thoughts on the processing - I am sure every photographer goes thru some phase and this might just be one for me, but I was trying to mix it up a bit and push the boundaries, even just a smidgen.. Secondly, composition, does it match the processing? does it match a photo era? comments? thoughts? abuse? - i'll take it all free freddo to any lighthouse nut who can identify this one. Last edited by biggerry on Sat Jul 24, 2010 9:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: Lighthouse ProcessingI'm not a lighthouse nut but it looks like Leeuwin to me. I haven't been up it but have seen it from the opposite view, across the ridge in the background of the first shot.
Canon 7D | Canon 350D | G5 | S95 | 24-70mm f2.8L | 50mm f1.8 II | 70-200mm f2.8L USM | 430EX II | Strobist gear
Re: Lighthouse ProcessingI concur: definitely Leeuwin.
In the first one you've definitely gone for "an old era". The (lack of) colour, the grain, 4:5 aspect ratio, etc. But as for the others: what about them indicates particular eras to you?
Re: Lighthouse ProcessingI took the same view as the first one when I was photographing Australian lighthouses in 1987, except that I used a fisheye lense. No particular changes since then except no people on the road in mine. (The lighthouses were still manned then and probably no visitors).
Re: Lighthouse Processing1st one looks quite 1920s.
3rd one perhaps somewhat retro ?70s. I can't place the others. Which era were you thinking of? Nice composition in the last one btw. Obviously heights don't worry you.
Re: Lighthouse ProcessingThe lighthouse itself and the cottages are from the 1890s. There were very few major lighthouses built in the 20th century.
Re: Lighthouse Processing
lucky ur in WA, or else I would have to cough up my freddo for ya The more I look at it the more I realise its a pretty distinguishable lighthouse. doh.
thats kinda my question Quite frankly i would not know, however at a guess I would say the first is 1930's and the remaining 1960s or 1970s
probably won't change for awhile too, still got a dude 'manning' it too.
lol...not too much gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: Lighthouse Processing
Yeah but he won't be a Lighthouse Keeper though, probably a Ranger. The last Australian lighthouse keeper was in the early 90s at Maatsuyker Is off the Southwest Cape of Tasmania and that was only because the local fishermen insisted on it for a while. All the lights have been automated since the late 80s or earlier, and large ships haven't needed them for decades due to radar and other electronic stuff. When the weather is dark and foggy and stormy and you need the lights most, you can see them the least.
Re: Lighthouse Processing
ok. The dude lives in teh cottage (seen in the first picture) and looks after the lighthouse and runs the tours - that rates as being 'manned' for me gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: Lighthouse ProcessingI thought it was the lighthouse on the Newtown coast line?
The first one is very 1920/30s - I just reckon you should have manned up and taken the photo over the rail. I like the others. Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Re: Lighthouse Processing
I would have...but my fatass would not fit out the little door - apparently people were smaller back then gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: Lighthouse ProcessingCan't say which era for which photo but for me, the 3rd one is the weaker out of the lot. The other 3 have more interesting compositions and look and feel to them.
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
Re: Lighthouse ProcessingI like only the last one. The others do nothing for me.
Previous topic • Next topic
13 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|